The EU debate - Part III

I'm probably going to upset a few people again now, but this is where my policy of incentives for having children came from.

 

You're just pathetic, rather than annoying...

 

I didn't quote anyone in my initial post mentioning Hitler so what point was I supposed to be addressing? I made a comment that was the opinion of Stan.

I think part of the problem you have with other people's posts is that this thread has pretty much taken over your life and you see yourself as the conductor of it. The reality is that, judging by the responses you get, most people just see you as a sad old ****.

 

You can keep stamping your feet and banging your wee drum, but it doesn't make it any more relevant, especially when you yourself have quoted from the article I posted that says " It is the first GDP figure covering a full quarter following the EU referendum, suggesting growth continues to be broadly unaffected following the EU referendum with a strong performance in the services industries offsetting falls in manufacturing and construction. "

Which conflicts with your claim.

 

Anyone that has a different opinion to yours is pathetic,we all know that.

 

If you'd care to get back to the point rather than trying to personalise it, it'll help keep things on track. You seem very confused on the purpose of discussion forums.

It was my initial post to you on this I was referring to.

 

Are you really comparing the Third Reich with the EU? Do you know how demented that sounds?

That's another top link that you've got there. Dr Matthias Rath is not a massive charlatan selling snake oil in any way.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Matthias_Rath
Literally killing people with his bullshit. You do love a con-man, don't you?

 

I haven't said I admire the man.

Have a look at the background to the EU and the stated aims of those driving it and their comments on a Federal Europe.

 

Nope, I'm not comparing those two, I'm simply pointing out the background and drivers of the organisation that you support. I'm the one that's wanted no part of it from the off.

 

Simple facts!!

First quarter growth 0.7%
Second quarter 0.5%
A decline!
Now, I'll leave you to try and spin those facts into whatever bullshit you can contrive!...

 

There you go, the conductor wants to "keep things on track". Is that how you see the purpose of discussion forums?!

You're off your sad, old head fella. Did you actually do anything today apart from post essays on here?

 

I know, you got them from the link I posted, and where the other quotes came from.

 

His sad, lonely existence has made him go potty.

 

You're not pointing out anything.
You're relying on fruitcakes and demagogues for your information, as usual.

 

You spout more **** than all the rest of us put together.

 

No, wrong,

I'm more than happy to debate with somebody with a reasoned, cohesive argument. As I have done with Bod, and others.
Zlatan is just a nasty little racist and white supremacist.

 

You do realise that criticising me for wanting to keep it on track is confirmation of what I've been saying, and discredits you and your buddies.

Trying to personalise it simply shows you have no real argument.

 

Steady, those fruitcakes and demagogues set up the EU you love.

 

The facts are that the Brexit effect has damaged the economy. It's plain to see, and will become more apparent to the public at large next year as price rises start to hit home.

 

So you've got no answer as to why you're quoting someone that's demonstrably an utter bullshitter, then?
The man's a complete lunatic. Why do you believe that his information's reliable?