The EU debate - Part III

@ZLATAN was easy to slam dunk last night The fella is so full of hate, he overlooked glaring mistakes in basic maths, in his ferrel state. And then realising I'd caught him out didnt have the courage to admit his cock up, choosing instead to irrationally defend his bare-faced idiocy. I quite enjoyed putting him straight tbh

 

Why should we give it any weight? The whole thing could quite easily be a complete invention.
The media sources are awful and their sources are non-existent.
What's convincing about it, other than it being a message that you agree with?

 

You are walking down the street and you catch a glimpse of a very tall guy grab a man's wallet and run into a shopping mall. It happened so quickly you didn't remember anything else about him other than he was very tall and he had silver buttons on his shirt. When you go in the mall to look for the thief should you look for very tall people first, or is that unfair on the very many innocent very tall people and should you equally pay attention to very tall and short people to be more fair?

 

Zlatan's just lifted the veil. What's different about what he's saying and a lot of the other stuff on here?
He's Nick Griffin to certain other people's Nigel Farage.

Walk around throwing Nazi salutes and calling yourself a white supremacist and everyone will dismiss you.
Put on a suit, say that you're on the side of the working man and the same rhetoric becomes more palatable.
That they're not even on the side of the working man makes it even worse, for me.

 

I bet a lot of people would say that disagreeing with a black man is racist.

 

Disagree with a black man is not racist. Disagreeing with him because he is black is racist

 

Like I've said before, it's easy to do behind the safety of a keyboard. Put @ZLATAN outside the comfort of his social circle, in the real world - somewhere like Question Time like Griffin and watch him get ridiculed far worse than I did last night. He's too much of a coward to do that though. And he knows it

 

No, they wouldn't. You probably read that in the Mail or the Express and have taken it as gospel.
The funny thing is that for a pair of bible thumping papers, they don't act much like Jesus.
Their readers would lock him up and then deport him.

 

Men named Larry are statistically prone to kill. Question all the Larrys first.

 

It is indeed that simple and yet some people, like Pete, find it so difficult to understand.

 

And herein lies the problem for bigots. A point lost on @petersaxton

 

Leftie types would say that people disagree with him because he is black whether that is the case or not.

 

Let's just be grateful this never reproduced.

 

Can you qualify that or did you hear it from an unnamed source?

 

Back in the 1980s some students at Goldsmiths did an investigation into stories in the press regarding race.
Some of the stories were how councils banned the words "black bags" for dustman, "black coffee" in rest rooms and nurseries banned "baa baa black sheep" and schools banned "blackboards".
What the students found was that
1) they found no staff who could corroborate a single allegation
2) that schools were moving from blackboards to white boards with pens (as they were cleaner) so staff and kids simply stopped using the word blackboard.
3) that the nurseries mentioned still sang baa baa black sheep
4) people still drank black coffee and called it black coffee
5) bin men still called them black bags ... and had never been told to stop cos they were black and bags.

Yet all of those stories are still considered to be facts 30 years on.

 

So you can see why Black men get stopped more often.

 

Who by?

 

Amazing how willing some people are to blatantly lie rather than back down.
Truely pathetic

 

Scared fat white pensioners who read the Mail.

 

I don't think Pete ever knowingly lies. He's just an unfortunate mix of thick and self-important to the point he's convinced himself his beliefs are facts.