let's make it even easierLet's make this easier then:
Is Clinton innocent?
Is Clinton guilty?
is Clinton crooked?
As I tried to explain earlier she hasn't technically been 'cleared' because she has never been tried.
innocent or guilty of what?
let's make it even easierLet's make this easier then:
Is Clinton innocent?
Is Clinton guilty?
is Clinton crooked?
As I tried to explain earlier she hasn't technically been 'cleared' because she has never been tried.
I'm interested to know how you know this. I've never met any of the people chanting this. I'm just taking their words at face value. You seem to know what is behind them.no it wasn't
the chant was "lock her up"
that didn't mean without a fair trial
I don't think "lock her up after a fair trial" would be so effective as a chant
As the discussion is about neither, I'll just tick that down to another bit of shifting from you.
You said she was cleared, but you've posted nothing at all to prove that other than a sub editors scribbling in a newspaper headline.
I said that the FBI investigation concluded that there was evidence of crime, and that there would likely to be consequences for such actions in other cases, but that on balance, it wasn't seen as enough to justify proposing prosecution on this occasion. I posted the FBI report that says that.
Of committing a crime, obviouslylet's make it even easier
innocent or guilty of what?
common senseI'm interested to know how you know this. I've never met any of the people chanting this. I'm just taking their words at face value. You seem to know what is behind them.
she hasn't been found guilty yet but she does seem to get involved in rather a lot of criminal scandalsOf committing a crime, obviously
That's exactly the sort of evasive answer I was referring to earlier. What criminal behaviour has she even been charged with? What 'scandals'.she hasn't been found guilty yet but she does seem to get involved in rather a lot of criminal scandals
Let's make this easier then:
Is Clinton innocent?
Is Clinton guilty?
is Clinton crooked?
As I tried to explain earlier she hasn't technically been 'cleared' because she has never been tried.

Comey quotes
'We cannot find a case that would support bringing criminal charges based on these facts'
He goes on to say
'To be clear, this is not to suggest that in similar circumstances a person who engaged in this activity would face no consequences .... those individuals are often subject to security or administrative sanctions.'
It seems clear to me that Clinton did wrong and in normal circumstances would face punishment, but the punishment would not be criminal. So Clinton was cleared of criminal charges but what she did was wrong. It also seems clear to me that you are attempting to combine the admission of wrongdoing with a claim that it was criminal, something that is not supported.
evasive?That's exactly the sort of evasive answer I was referring to earlier. What criminal behaviour has she even been charged with? What 'scandals'.
1) I have never claimed she was cleared, i was trying to remove the source of disagreement between you and PnP.You keep changing the point you made. I'll take that as the realisation you were wrong.
She hasn't been 'cleared' which was your claim. You now seem to agere, even if it is for different reasons.
The FBI quite clearly say that there was evidence to show that the law had been broken, and that others in that situation would suffer consequences. That is NOT cleared.
I wasn't 'accusing' anyone of anything. Merely stating a fact that chants of 'lock her up' were being made towards an innocent person. If you are happy with that state of affairs then good luck to you.evasive?
I thought you were accusing people of saying she should be locked up without a fair trial
now when somebody says something else you are not happy with that either
maybe you are just not a very happy person?
I've explained a lot and now you are just going back to your default rant modeI wasn't 'accusing' anyone of anything. Merely stating a fact that chants of 'lock her up' were being made towards an innocent person. If you are happy with that state of affairs then good luck to you.
The claim was that she was cleared. You yourself say that she wasn't.
Oh, and the punishment could well be criminal.
In my experience what people claim as 'common sense' is often really stupidity.common sense
common sense is always better than stupidity
I prefer my experience to yours any dayIn my experience what people claim as 'common sense' is often really stupidity.
You've responded to none of my arguments and answered none of my questions and I've been unfailingly polite at all timesI've explained a lot and now you are just going back to your default rant mode
She was cleared of criminal charges and the FBI report does not support your claim that the punishment could be criminal, it states the complete opposite.
You seem rather desperate to proove an unsupported position. An agenda perhaps?