Just being a **** doesn't merit a horrible death. Deliberately killing someone does. Who has he killed?
The EU debate - Part III
- Thread starter Jürgenmeiʃter
- Start date
-
Please bear with us on the new site integration and fixing any known bugs over the coming days. If you can not log in please try resetting your password and check your spam box. If you have tried these steps and are still struggling email [email protected] with your username/registered email address
-
- Status
Kustard has, very wisely, given up using words 
You must log in or register to see images
woof! woof!
Taken the mutt for walkies yet? Can't have her ****ting on your rug
You must log in or register to see images
woof! woof!
Taken the mutt for walkies yet? Can't have her ****ting on your rug
I'll **** down your ****ing throat if we ever meet, pal...
That's a promise!..
I agree totally with your sentiment, but find it sad you're not consistent with that view when it's others on the receiving end.
Who, exactly.,?
I don't make deeply insulting comments about anybody's wife or family?
If you want to try to draw the line where you have, it's your prerogative. Your indignance rings hollow to me given the amount and level of personal abuse dished out to others. Trying to justify it and claim a difference simply doesn't work for me as I think they're both wrong, but I'd say the comments about your wife are far as less offensive.
Last edited:
It must be nice up there on the moral high ground.
You'd best ask NSIS, he's claiming it. I'm down here on a level playing field.
Well you're wrong! I have dished out plenty of personal abuse to other posters on here, and received the same. I have never resorted to highly personal insults about their family.
And you still haven't answered my question!...
I thought it was obvious, but to save this one going down that feeble rabbit hole, and as you need it spelling out, point me at you calling out some on here for the personal abuse of Peter Saxton, including comments about his wife, family and business and pictures of him and friends.
The claim for justification because he put it in the public domain is hollow.
I doubt he's the only one that's received abuse that you've not called people on, and no, I'm not hunting examples.
I agree with you about the comments, it's the consistency I'm critical of.
Peter Saxton, by his own volition, put all his personal details, including his own name, on an internet football forum. Don't you think that's stupid? Do you know anybody else who's done that?
By doing so, he has invited others to use your beloved Google to find out all about his personal life. Some of that has been used to expose his beliefs and hypocrisy.
I, personally, have never posted any of his photos, personal details, etc. If others have done it, I don't necessarily condone some of it, but as I feel he brought it on himslf to a very large extent, I don't have much sympathy.
The vast majority was personal abuse aimed at him personally, another poster on this forum. I cannot recall any highly personal insults about his wife.
Once again, I can handle all the personal abuse you or any others chuck at me, but making highly personal and abusive remarks about my lady, is bang out of order!...
He's a ****!...
Would you stand for somebody making those remarks about somebody you cared about?...
- Status