The EU debate - Part III

  • Please bear with us on the new site integration and fixing any known bugs over the coming days. If you can not log in please try resetting your password and check your spam box. If you have tried these steps and are still struggling email [email protected] with your username/registered email address
  • Log in now to remove adverts - no adverts at all to registered members!
Status
Not open for further replies.
Hull City AFC (DMD) said:
You wishing I was screaming makes it no more accurate than most of your nonsense.

Brexit is chugging onward. The chattering classes are giving good worked examples of why people are tired of them and their pompous manipulations.

If the decision is that the rules say it goes through the house, so be it. I accept in the same way I'd accept it if it didn't need to do that. I'm ambivalent to an appeal too.

No drama, no hysterics.
Click to expand...

Manipulations? What manipulations are these exactly?
 
NowsufferinginSpain said:
It has zero to do with chattering classes, as you so pompously dismiss it.

It was an important point of law. If the High court had ruled in May's favour, that would give her, and indeed any future PM, the perogative to override UK law, providing they had the majority in the commons to do it..

I've no doubt Brexit will eventually go ahead, in some form or other. However, this will certainly delay it and will also mean that May has to be very mindful of the strong pro-EU proprortion of her own party, and what they will accept, when forming the negotiating stance.
Click to expand...

Yep, it just causes expense delay and uncertainty with no real change in the outcome.

It also really does provide an example of the attitude of the pompousity of the chattering classes. Little wonder you try to dismiss that.

It is was it is. No drama, no hysterics.
 
Hull City AFC (DMD) said:
Yep, it just causes expense delay and uncertainty with no real change in the outcome.

It also really does provide an example of the attitude of the pompousity of the chattering classes. Little wonder you try to dismiss that.

It is was it is. No drama, no hysterics.
Click to expand...

I dismissed it as it's meaningless bollocks. Like so much of what you post. Big words with nothing behind them.

It was an important point of law. If you can't see that then there's little point in talking about it further.
 
Hull City AFC (DMD) said:
Yep, it just causes expense delay and uncertainty with no real change in the outcome.

It also really does provide an example of the attitude of the pompousity of the chattering classes. Little wonder you try to dismiss that.

It is was it is. No drama, no hysterics.
Click to expand...

What does? A desire to ensure that the correct democratic process is upheld, is somehow an example of the pomposity of the chattering classes?

What a crock of meaningless ****e that is.
 
Hull City AFC (DMD) said:
Yep, it just causes expense delay and uncertainty with no real change in the outcome.

It also really does provide an example of the attitude of the pompousity of the chattering classes. Little wonder you try to dismiss that.

It is was it is. No drama, no hysterics.
Click to expand...
You still whining? <laugh>
 
Hull City AFC (DMD) said:
Oh dear, leavers accept a decision, and remoaners STILL moan.

These people must be made of jelly.
Click to expand...

There's a lot of <wah> from Leavers who wanted a Rock Hard Brexit. The Daily Saxton is aiming it's snarling at the unelected judges for humiliating the unelected PM.

The unelected 'activist' judges who mounted a 'power grab': High Court trio who blocked Brexit are led by one who founded group dedicated to furthering European integration

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-3901170/The-three-judges-blocked-Brexit.html
 
Stanley the Magnet said:
There's a lot of <wah> from Leavers who wanted a Rock Hard Brexit. The Daily Saxton is aiming it's snarling at the unelected judges for humiliating the unelected PM.

The unelected 'activist' judges who mounted a 'power grab': High Court trio who blocked Brexit are led by one who founded group dedicated to furthering European integration

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-3901170/The-three-judges-blocked-Brexit.html
Click to expand...

I'd expect nothing less than this bolllocks from The Fail.

An important point of law dismissed by their usual rabid anti EU nonsense.

Power grab, by High Court Judges? <laugh>
 
Hull City AFC (DMD) said:
You wishing I was screaming makes it no more accurate than most of your nonsense.

Brexit is chugging onward. The chattering classes are giving good worked examples of why people are tired of them and their pompous manipulations.

If the decision is that the rules say it goes through the house, so be it. I accept in the same way I'd accept it if it didn't need to do that. I'm ambivalent to an appeal too.

No drama, no hysterics.
Click to expand...
Can you imagine what it would have been like if the loonies had lost the court decision? They would have been screaming and crying for months.
 
  • Like
Reactions: DMD and The Prime Minister
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top Bottom
Back