Vote: Pixie's Greatest Ever Wum F*ck Up!

  • Thread starter Thread starter Hoddle is a god
  • Start date Start date
  • Please bear with us on the new site integration and fixing any known bugs over the coming days. If you can not log in please try resetting your password and check your spam box. If you have tried these steps and are still struggling email [email protected] with your username/registered email address
  • Log in now to remove adverts - no adverts at all to registered members!

Which is Pixie's biggest wum **** up

  • "Harry Kane is a one-season wonder, lads!" (right before he wins the Golden Boot)

  • "Saints08 and HIAG are the same person" (right before a Super Mod proves that we're not)

  • Both of the above are equally stupid


Results are only viewable after voting.
I do not know if you have Autism. How can I know for sure?

But it is a fact - in my opinion (having observed Autism at close hand) - that you exhibit many of the traits of someone with that condition.

That is not being disparaging of those who suffer with Autism, and your attempts to claim otherwise are cowardly and disingenuous. Dare I say it, but it is another example of your Autistic nature?

One of your funnier posts ... <laugh> ... well now that you've moved on from law to being a psychological clinician, what would your view be of someone with the following character traits?:

  • Obssessive need for attention
  • Unrealistic and disproprtionate self perception
  • Constant fantasising about personal acheivements and lifestyle
  • Inability to accept responsibility for their own actions
  • Unwillingness to abide by the terms of agreements made - which were freely entered into
  • Unable to accept when an argument is lost or that a claim made is irrefutably proven to have been incorrect
  • Inabbility to respond to requests for explanations to specific points or comments made, instead obsessively repeating largely irreleveant deflections in desperate attempts to avoid requested responses.
  • Frequent outbursts of rage when under pressure
  • Demanding sanctions against those with alternative views or theories once an argument is going against them
  • Tendencies to try and outrage anyone they are at odds with either through language, sexual references or images - usually as a last resort once a debate has started to go against them
  • Obsession with particular individuals to most unnatural degrees

Now I don't pretend to be a doctor, or anything else ... but that little lot certainly doesn't suggest a balanced, rational personality to me
 
Last edited:
One of your funnier posts ... <laugh> ... well now that you've moved on from law to being a psychological clinician, what would your view be of someone with the following character traits?:

  • Obssessive need for attention
  • Unrealistic and disproprtionate self percption
  • Constant fantasising about personal acheivements and lifestyle
  • Inability to accept responsibility for their own actions
  • Unwillingness to abide by the terms of agreements made - which were freely entered into
  • Unable to accept when an argument is lost or that a claim made is irrefutably proven to have been incorrect
  • Inabbility to respond to requests for explanations to specific points or comments made, instead obsessively repeating largely irreleveant deflections in desperate attempts to avoid requested responses.
  • Frequent outbursts of rage when under pressure
  • Demanding sanctions against those with alternative views or theories once an argument is going against them
  • Tendencies to try and outrage anyone they are at odds with either through language, sexual references or images - usually as a last resort once a debate has started to go against them
  • Obsession with particular individuals to most unnatural degrees

Now I don't pretend to be a doctor, or anything else ... but that little lot certainly doesn't suggest a balanced, rational personality to me

It's called 'Self actualised **** wit syndrome'



Dr Piskie. BSc, MD, PhD.
 
  • Like
Reactions: The Ginger Marks
I was taking the piss but I see you are getting all ****ish in your replies
[HASHTAG]#wembleybutthurt[/HASHTAG]

ps he isn't a supermod he is just a mod

G4E, honestly, I have grown tired and am, therefore, extremely fractious, over this entire issue.

No one loves banter more than I do, and when it comes to "taking when you give it" I take more than everyone else on this forum put together.

But this business has long since gone beyond a joke. All I ask is for people to give it a rest on this one subject.
 
G4E, honestly, I have grown tired and am, therefore, extremely fractious, over this entire issue.

No one loves banter more than I do, and when it comes to "taking when you give it" I take more than everyone else on this forum put together.

But this business has long since gone beyond a joke. All I ask is for people to give it a rest on this one subject.

In other words, you had a monumental meltdown because you got done on a football forum again <laugh>

You certainly do 'take it' more than anybody else. Have you ever stopped to consider why that is ?

If you want it to stop, it's completely in your control. Just saying <ok>
 
Thanks

i see Hiag was so outraged by my post to saints that he forgot to log in under that account to reply to me
[HASHTAG]#schoolboyerror[/HASHTAG]

Always a give away that HB, he must have been shaking with anger when he made that post and plumb forgot who he was supposed to be. <laugh>
Ps. Out of interest he actually admitted to me in a post that he was SIAB. I think I'm going to refer to him as SIHIAB, it's only right I should be polictcally correct.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Robby202
In other words, you had a monumental meltdown because you got done on a football forum again <laugh>

You certainly do 'take it' more than anybody else. Have you ever stopped to consider why that is ?

If you want it to stop, it's completely in your control. Just saying <ok>
^ This <ok>
 
I have grown tired and am, therefore, extremely fractious, over this entire issue.

All I ask is for people to give it a rest on this one subject.

So you're bottling your own thread ?

Personally I'm a bit disappointed that you're throwing in the towel, especially after you said this:
Pixie, I know this thread is going to be hard for you.
 
One of your funnier posts ... <laugh> ... well now that you've moved on from law to being a psychological clinician, what would your view be of someone with the following character traits?:

  • Obssessive need for attention
  • Unrealistic and disproprtionate self percption
  • Constant fantasising about personal acheivements and lifestyle
  • Inability to accept responsibility for their own actions
  • Unwillingness to abide by the terms of agreements made - which were freely entered into
  • Unable to accept when an argument is lost or that a claim made is irrefutably proven to have been incorrect
  • Inabbility to respond to requests for explanations to specific points or comments made, instead obsessively repeating largely irreleveant deflections in desperate attempts to avoid requested responses.
  • Frequent outbursts of rage when under pressure
  • Demanding sanctions against those with alternative views or theories once an argument is going against them
  • Tendencies to try and outrage anyone they are at odds with either through language, sexual references or images - usually as a last resort once a debate has started to go against them
  • Obsession with particular individuals to most unnatural degrees

Now I don't pretend to be a doctor, or anything else ... but that little lot certainly doesn't suggest a balanced, rational personality to me

Reading this the name that popped into my head was SIHIAB:emoticon-0137-clapp
 
...what would your view be of someone with the following character traits?:

  • Obssessive need for attention
  • Unrealistic and disproprtionate self percption
  • Constant fantasising about personal acheivements and lifestyle
  • Inability to accept responsibility for their own actions
  • Unwillingness to abide by the terms of agreements made - which were freely entered into
  • Unable to accept when an argument is lost or that a claim made is irrefutably proven to have been incorrect
  • Inabbility to respond to requests for explanations to specific points or comments made, instead obsessively repeating largely irreleveant deflections in desperate attempts to avoid requested responses.
  • Frequent outbursts of rage when under pressure
  • Demanding sanctions against those with alternative views or theories once an argument is going against them
  • Tendencies to try and outrage anyone they are at odds with either through language, sexual references or images - usually as a last resort once a debate has started to go against them


Oh, jeez, Bambi! I never knew, pal! You should have told us that you suffer from this affliction.

I always thought that your long-winded diatribes was the result of you being a prick, but it turns out that you suffer from a debilitating mental illness!

I am almost sorry to hear that.
<ok>
 
Why the **** were you bleating on about libellous claims and talking about civil court action then ?

Simply repeating the same lie that you've made twice before will not magically make it true, Pixie.

Admit you ****ed up, and recover a little dignity.
 
I'm on my kindle...I can't see anything to click.

I vant to wote for dimocracee ah ah.


Pixie will be furious that you've declared a desire to vote in his wum **** up poll. He was certain that no one would be interested, mate.
<laugh>
 
  • Like
Reactions: Spurlock
Oh, jeez, Bambi! I never knew, pal! You should have told us that you suffer from this affliction.

I always thought that your long-winded diatribes was the result of you being a prick, but it turns out that you suffer from a debilitating mental illness!

I am almost sorry to hear that.
<ok>

... I left out predictability on purpose fella ... as for being sorry ... I genuinely am starting to feel a bit sorry for you <ok>
 
  • Like
Reactions: The Ginger Marks
I don't want to hear you, 50 pages from now, complaining that 'Nasty Pixie' is bullying you HIAG <laugh>

I don't see you as nasty. I see you as mentally challenged, and I cannot hate that. Pity you? Possibly, if I didn't think you were so dangerous to yourself and others.

Also, I never complain about you bullying me. That would be like my complaining that the turkeys in the barrel are gobbling in my direction! That would be utterly ridiculous!
 
I don't see you as nasty. I see you as mentally challenged, and I cannot hate that. Pity you? Possibly, if I didn't think you were so dangerous to yourself and others.

Also, I never complain about you bullying me. That would be like my complaining that the turkeys in the barrel are gobbling in my direction! That would be utterly ridiculous!

Turkeys in the barrel? ... is that a local expression?
 
The way in which I have described my ripping the piss out of Pixie, in the past, is in terms both of a turkey-shoot and shooting fish in a barrel. The analogy in my previous post has simply amalgamated the two concepts to save time, Bambi.

My creativity lends itself to such invention.

Don't you try it, though. It won't be safe for you.
 
The way in which I have described my ripping the piss out of Pixie, in the past, is in terms both of a turkey-shoot and shooting fish in a barrel. The analogy in my previous post has simply amalgamated the two concepts to save time, Bambi.

My creativity lends itself to such invention.

Don't you try it, though. It won't be safe for you.


... thanks for the explanation ...you'll obviously accept that the analogy was inevitably lost in it needing one ...

I'm starting to think that your rather unique sense of humour and vernacular get a little lost on the footie part of Not606 ... surely there must be a Dungeons & Dragqueens board where you would feel more at home and with alike minds? ... you could take Saints with you .. he'd still support your views and 'like' your posts irrespective of the gobbledygook being spouted <laugh>
 
  • Like
Reactions: The Ginger Marks