The EU debate - Part III
- Thread starter Jürgenmeiʃter
- Start date
-
Please bear with us on the new site integration and fixing any known bugs over the coming days. If you can not log in please try resetting your password and check your spam box. If you have tried these steps and are still struggling email [email protected] with your username/registered email address
-
- Status
Did you get Dull to write that for you?Although the source is from an unreliable group that ****ed up their last prediction (August 2016), here is a bit of the article that sums up most sensible people's feelings on the matter;
"While we expect this to be only a temporary phenomenon, it will nonetheless weigh on the purchasing power of consumers over the next couple of years."
As a leave voter, I expected and accept there will be some economical adjustments to be made in the run up to and for a while after the transition, and hope/expect it proves to be a price worth paying. Sadly, an element of whiny remain voters cannot accept that they lost the referendum and continue to create straw man arguments in an attempt to prevent this truth being aired. Instead, they continue with their ridiculously overstated prophecies of economic collapse and of a raging race war of epic proportions, all blame for which is to be laid at the feet of the leave voters
Newsflash guys!
1. We have been through far worse economic situations before and come out of them in one piece and will do so again. This time without the albatross that is the EU weighing us down.
2. The evil that is racism existed before the referendum and will exist after we leave the EU. Reported cases of racisim have been increasing for years and while there has been a larger rise around the time of the referendum, this is hardly surprising is it? Yet you are trying to hold it up like some shocking and unexpected phenomenon.
Yes racism is evil and needs to be squashed, but your shouting "racist" at your own shadows is not helping anyone. You are simply making a mockery of a very serious issue.
Your desperate need to score points invalidates your faux outrage.
You really need to stop reading all of that alt-right nonsense that is totally misinforming you.
It's clearly damaging stuff, as it's bled into your language and narrative.
None of it's sourced properly and most of it's a complete fabrication, as I demonstrated to you last night with your Ginger Jihad story.
The fact that you're trumpeting Trump (sorry) is quite embarrassing, frankly.
Crooked Hillary? This from a guy that's ripping off his own polling people.
He's a con man. Why are you buying his nonsense?
No, Clinton is bad but Trump is worse (and dangerous)!Trump is bad so Clinton must be good?
Let's see what the impartial FBI find.
Did you see the lady interviewed last night? As a child she was dragged off her bike, thrown in a truck raped and left in a coma for five days.
Crooked Hillary voluntered to defend the rapist, and helped him avoid prison knowing he was guilty, and laughed about it.
Did you see the independent reports on bias in the media coverage of the US election?
It's not a case of suporting Trump, it's more not wanting that crooked, rapist apologist war monger from a party with its roots in racism and the KKK in power.
When did I say that?Trump is bad so Clinton must be good?
Trump is an absolute nightmare. Clinton isn't even vaguely near his level of ****.
You wish I wasNot that you're bothered
Fact is, I'm just calling it as it is and I'll keep reminding you in case you forget - snide.
The impartial FBI? They found nothing and aren't going to find anything this time.
Comey's finished his career by being partisan, by the way. Not talking about Russia but releasing this will do for him.
Clinton did her job as a public defender. She didn't volunteer to do anything.
The defendant plead guilty and didn't go free, either.
http://www.snopes.com/hillary-clinton-freed-child-rapist-laughed-about-it/
Trump's in the same position as the bloke that you're accusing her of supporting.
He's accused of raping a child and has to go to court over it in December.
He's also been accused of sexually assaulting around a dozen other women. Don't pretend that this is about rape.
As for racism and the KKK, you're attempting to compare the situation from 70-odd years ago to now.
The Republicans are currently the racist party and are attempting to suppress the black vote, as I've already demonstrated to you.
The KKK have actually backed Trump, too:
https://www.washingtonpost.com/news...aper-has-endorsed-donald-trump-for-president/
You're not backing his because you think that he's less racist than Clinton, as that's a ridiculous statement.
Why can't you be honest about why you like him?
You're not bothered and you'll keep reminding me that you're not bothered. Got it!You wish I was
Fact is, I'm just calling it as it is and I'll keep reminding you in case you forget - snide.
Says the ****tard decrying the Mail newspaper because it supported Hitler 80 years ago.
I think there may have been a change in personnel since WW2 you hypocritical muppet.
It's only bollocks to you because it's beyond your comprehension.
Do something useful and go take Fido for walkies
Says the ****tard decrying the Mail newspaper because it supported Hitler 80 years ago.
I think there may have been a change in personnel since WW2 you hypocritical muppet.
Though one could be forgiven for thinking not given what they continue to churn out while the Democrats have clearly evolved into something very different.
The Mail hasn't changed it's bigoted outlook and still preaches hatred and intolerance.Says the ****tard decrying the Mail newspaper because it supported Hitler 80 years ago.
I think there may have been a change in personnel since WW2 you hypocritical muppet.
The Democrats clearly don't and The Southern Strategy's well known.
Try comparing like for like next time, eh?
You genuinely don't know that 'loony left' is an insult and an illogical thought do you?
- Status