Off Topic Vote - HIAG's best wum **** up

You mean conveyancing secretary right.

 

The association is there as you know my clubs Chelsea and your statement implicates you in public libel as you said the clubs run by a Russian gangster. Game set match!

 

My post said that there was a period since it was bankrolled by a Russian gangster. No-one could have their reputation hurt by such a claim, since they would have to admit that they fitted the description well enough for it to apply to them

 

I am informed by a very good Chelsea source, that Mad Dog used to be the manager of a toy shop, before he became a Russian oil magnate.

That would explain why he is so good at throwing his toys out of his pram when things don't go well for him.

 

#StrawClutching

...the only alignment I have on here is to Leicester City FC ...my football club ... not in doubt that your alignment has nothing to do with yours ... more of that of an apologist for the HIAG persona obsession with weird films and thinking that likening other posters to special needs kids on buses or to those with autism can somehow be justified ...you should be hanging your collective head in shame.

 

Not so your statement read "If by 'normal' you mean since your Club was bankrolled by a Russian gangster then you are correct. It's a new meaning of 'normal' though".
Time has no baring if he read this and could be arsed he could pursue you for defamation of character. He wouldn't have to fit any criteria other than prove he isn't and as no newspapers or news organisations have said or printed such **** the onus on him proving it would be a simple one.

 

OK you've proven that you are not a lawyer and that you don't understand the concept of defamation.

 

look at it like this, defamation expressed by print, writing, pictures, signs, effigies, or any communication embodied in physical form that is injurious to a person's reputation. So calling Roman a gangster puts you in the wrong.

 

Skiddy barely has a grasp of the English language, let alone English law!

 

What is your opinion on skiddy's comments towards matth ?

 

...no deflection... let's have your condemnation of HIAG's appalling references to those unfortunate souls as reflections of posters who have had his measure..

 

Would appear I know more than you SIAB

 

Hi, Bambi.

I thought I'd interject on your moral outrage and point something out to you, in the spirit of a good neighbour.

I likened the behaviour of Skiddy and Pixie to those suffering from mental disabilities. In doing so, I cast no aspersions on those actually suffering from such disabilities. If either Skiddy or Pixie do suffer from the mental disability that I attributed to them, then I have made an accurate observation. If either of them do not suffer from a mental disability, then my observation still holds true, in that they each have demonstrated the behaviours of those suffering such mental disabilities.

Skiddy, on the other hand, has attacked an actual sufferer of Aspergers, using the disability to mock him. There is nothing observational about Skiddy's remarks. They are vile and pernicious.

Bambi, are you finally prepared to agree with us decent posters on this? Yes or no? Any answer other than a yes or no will be taken as a no answer.

 

No more vile or pernicious than your comments to Piskie, I find it hilarious how you need two accounts to attempt your faux outrage that no ones cares about other than yourselves Who find It offensive. I think you should look at yourselves in the mirror, personally I think you're beside yourself.

 

You can't have this all your own way. I've answered everything you've asked and you refuse to acknowledge a despicable comment thereby aligning your self to its sentiment. It's you who is deflecting here.

HIAG's remarks are, as I've said, not in the same realm as using someone's affliction to mock them, he even implied that having aspergers attributed to him being a ****. That is abhorrent fosse as you well know.

 

[QUOTE="Saib 08, post: 9838723, member: 1031444]

HIAG's remarks are, as I've said.[/QUOTE]

Yes they are the same! Funny that

 

Of course he's not a lawyer. He's the GOP nomination for president.

 

It's very refreshing to see someone refuse to toe the party line and speak through his own morals. You are everything piskie and fosse are not and believe me in this case that is a shining reflection on yourself.

 

I've shown you three times now where I've said that I condemn any comments that mock aspergers. Yet you still continue to back HIAG despite me posting multiple quotes of his mocking autistic children.

You're simply nothing but a stupid hypocrite.

 

You cannot bring yourself to acknowledge Skiddy's comments whereas I've spoken directly about HIAG's comments. It's disgusting to see that you can't put your agenda to one side and risk losing an ally in your childish war with HIAG

You don't have principles or views mate, not really. You want to have a pop at HIAG and Spurs, it's what defines you on this site and it's all you really are