As ever.
From you, it's par for the course.
Your last effort was 6 under par..
The EU debate - Part III
- Thread starter Jürgenmeiʃter
- Start date
-
Please bear with us on the new site integration and fixing any known bugs over the coming days. If you can not log in please try resetting your password and check your spam box. If you have tried these steps and are still struggling email [email protected] with your username/registered email address
-
- Status
From you, it's par for the course.
Your last effort was 6 under par..
Correct, I said "darker skin" and "non whites", not "blacks". The blacks reference was all your own work.
Do you consider people from India to be black?
And yet you remain obsessed and hanging on my every word.
I think at obsessed you might just be flattering yourself!..
Amused, yes..
Stan, I know you like attention, but struggle as you're a tad limited, but are you seriously trying to claim you meant Chinese?
There's a great article (that I can't find) by a journalist contacting various agencies, such as the black Police Officers Association, and the Campaign for racial Equality asking what he'd need to demonstrate to be defined as black. At that time they couldn't answer, as there was no definition.
They've since rejigged their policies, so I'll go by their definition, which is pretty much all encompassing. Effectively, it's self defined, so you can be black if you want.
It makes the over use of the ill-defined concept of racism self defeating when it gets drilled down.
I'd only be flattered if I saw it as a compliment. I just find it makes you look sad, clutters the thread and serves as a mindless pass time for me.
I'd only be flattered if I saw it as a compliment. I just find it makes you look sad, clutters the thread and serves as a mindless pass time for me.
Describing yourself as mindless is one of the very few accurate things you've ever posted!..
Absolutely. I find claims of a superior intellect tend to be made by people whose words rarely seem to support it.
You get very upset when anyone implies that they know better than you what you meant in a post and yet now you're doing just that with me in an attempt to deflect from your white / black generalisation.Stan, I know you like attention, but struggle as you're a tad limited, but are you seriously trying to claim you meant Chinese?
There's a great article (that I can't find) by a journalist contacting various agencies, such as the black Police Officers Association, and the Campaign for racial Equality asking what he'd need to demonstrate to be defined as black. At that time they couldn't answer, as there was no definition.
They've since rejigged their policies, so I'll go by their definition, which is pretty much all encompassing. Effectively, it's self defined, so you can be black if you want.
It makes the over use of the ill-defined concept of racism self defeating when it gets drilled down.
I meant non whites and darker skin. That's why I posted "non whites" and "darker skin".
You took that to mean "blacks". The Syrians and Iraqis so many people are fearful of aren't black.
And you're still stuck up his arse looking for change.
According to the campaign for racial equality, black police officers association and other key players, they can fall into the same category.
Especially given the context of the discussion, you betray your bigotry and prejudice by assuming that Syrians and Iraqis can't be black.
According to the campaign for racial equality, black police officers association and other key players, they can fall into the same category.
Especially given the context of the discussion, you betray your bigotry and prejudice by assuming that Syrians and Iraqis can't be black.
This reminds me of a thread on here once where a Chelsea fan called Suarez a spic and eventually dug out a link to an article which said it was a common term a few hundred years ago to refer to a South American rather than just admit he'd been a bit ignorant.
So you do genuinely think that anyone who isn't white is automatically black and if anyone queries that they are in fact bigoted?According to the campaign for racial equality, black police officers association and other key players, they can fall into the same category.
Especially given the context of the discussion, you betray your bigotry and prejudice by assuming that Syrians and Iraqis can't be black.
Nice one Dull, you've hung yourself again
According to the campaign for racial equality, black police officers association and other key players, they can fall into the same category.
Especially given the context of the discussion, you betray your bigotry and prejudice by assuming that Syrians and Iraqis can't be black.
dont waste your time with him
So you do genuinely think that anyone who isn't white is automatically black and if anyone queries that they are in fact bigoted?
Nice one Dull, you've hung yourself again
A strange leap and twist in logic there Stanley. You'd best target your point to the Black Police Officers Association.
Where have I used google in this wee exchange Stanley?
It's not needed to show your ignorance no matter how much you wriggle.
- Status