You could do the same article on 6 or 7 of the premiership teams and reveal a similar, and in some cases more depressing story, what it cant do though is reveal what might of happened if they had stayed, its pure speculation to suggest that they would have achieved the same levels had they stayed put, as some players just aren't the right fit at the time and also the players themselves were more likely under more pressure to preform under the manager of the day.
If we go with the 3-5-2 formation, then Lukaku would improve us being upfront with Costa, Lukaku is better than any of our other strikers bar Costa.
Cech is still and imo, always will be, better than Courtois, so he would also improve us, albeit marginally.
------------------Cech-------------------
------Zouma------Luiz-----JT---------
Azpi--Willian--Kante--Hazard-Bertand
-------Lukaku----------Costa----------
That'd be a team that would challenge, and then some.
Bertrand was a rock for us in the CL in that left mid position.
And thats WITHOUT De Bruyne.
--------------------Cech---------------------
-------Zouma--------Luiz--------JT---------
Willian--KDB--Kante--Hazard-Bertand
---------Lukaku-----------Costa-----------
if you fit him in, you could dump Azpi and move Willian out further, and stick KDB next to Kante in the middle.
All pipe dreams I know, but that would be a good team.
Only KDB from that list & Lukaku marginally.
Others are OK - we have good (adequate) replacements.
100% with BobbyD.
Van Aanholt is better than our current LB choices let alone Bertrand.
Sunderland's defence lacked so much in the Centre back pairing.Dunno about that. Van Aanholt is great going forward, defensively he's been terrible. He has improved though and he has bulked up in the past year (so light before) but i'm still not a fan of his. He's part of that shocking sunderland defence.