Greedy bastard was on £3m a year from FA bit couldn't turn down £400k - serves the fat ****er right.
will be interesting to see who else is on the list!
how does agreeing a 400k deal for after dinner speaking compromise his position as national manager? And his way of 'skirting' the 3rd party ownership seems to be to buy the player outright. It's a hurricane in a thimble,
witch hunt in process

Agree with all that except the bit in bold and that depends on your view on investigative journalism.Looking at this in the cold light of day, it's a very sorry episode all round.
The Torygraph are snakes for putting a few beers in him and then sliding in questions about 3rd party ownership. What Sam said won't be news to anyone within the game, and what has been construed as 'advice' was merely him explaining what goes on. The aim of the meeting was to arrange speaking dates, they just got him to open up and he got his kecks pulled down.
No-one involved comes out with any credit for me. The FA have done what I suppose they had to do, given their stance on the integrity of the game, but the reality is nothing good has come from this, barring the Torygraph selling a few more copies.
not really, everyone knew it, you just had look at the commissions the 'agents' are getting to realise what's going on that the ineffectual associations turn a blind eye to.Agree with all that except the bit in bold and that depends on your view on investigative journalism.
This wasn't a sleazy catch him in a lap dancing bar effort, there's clear public interest in this information coming out. Journalists go undercover all the time chasing down stories that are in the public interest and granted while this wasn't about breaking a drug smuggling ring or catching human traffickers, in a sporting sense it's a pretty big underhand practice they've brought to light.
Let's not forget that Sam was only days into the job, hadn't even taken his first training session. He also chose not to respond to contact from the paper before the story went to press.
Agree with all that except the bit in bold and that depends on your view on investigative journalism.
This wasn't a sleazy catch him in a lap dancing bar effort, there's clear public interest in this information coming out. Journalists go undercover all the time chasing down stories that are in the public interest and granted while this wasn't about breaking a drug smuggling ring or catching human traffickers, in a sporting sense it's a pretty big underhand practice they've brought to light.
Let's not forget that Sam was only days into the job, hadn't even taken his first training session. He also chose not to respond to contact from the paper before the story went to press.


**** knows. Nobody listened to him.What did he say?
The public interest isn't just the footballing fraternity interest though is it? It's wider than that. It sullies our name on a world wide basis that the manager of our national team of our national game is getting caught with his hands in the till. Similar case in point - people who have no interest whatsoever in cycling have an interest in the Wiggins [alleged] doping claims and how that reflects badly not just in the sport but on the country's good name as a whole since he represents all of us in international competition. Look what we all think about Russia after the Olympic ban - it goes beyond the sport. It reflects badly on the nation.
I didn't know there were ways around TPO and that some were actively promoting it let alone one of them being the England manager. How did he get the job if the FA higher ups had even the slightest sniff of it? If they didn't know how come some on here seem so well clued up?
As for revelations, they're usually about specifics as this case is. The revelation is in the who, where and when, not the actual practice itself. As I said yesterday, I don't feel sorry for Allardyce he brought it on himself but he's in effect lost our Sammy his job as well![]()
Might be a bit of a stretch for the meaning of the phrase but I stand by it. Skimming money on illicit transfers is akin to stealing. I've just read this as wellIf he'd have been caught with his hands in the till I'd agree with you mate, but he hasn't
personally I'm hoping HMRC take a bit more of an interest, they've got a bit of a hard on for football, and I'd love to see SAF do a Lester Piggott.Might be a bit of a stretch for the meaning of the phrase but I stand by it. Skimming money on illicit transfers is akin to stealing. I've just read this as well
As for Big Sam, while it seems unlikely in the extreme that the 61-year-old will ever work at Barclays Premier League level again, this being football we can probably expect him to be back at West Ham within the week. There is enormous money to be made legitimately in English football right now but power corrupts and he was not the first and will not be the last to be caught with his hands in the till. Perhaps his perfect record as England manager will sustain him as he involuntarily enters early retirement.
You mean 'the most corrupt business in Britain'personally I'm hoping HMRC take a bit more of an interest, they've got a bit of a hard on for football, and I'd love to see SAF do a Lester Piggott.
