Just about see all four of them here... ...I couldn't quite fit them on one screen but it's readable.
I don't think Sakho as done much wrong with these comments. Sure, it's not ideal for the club but he's being screwed so I don't blame him for standing up for himself. Disappointing in that it places the final nail in the coffin imo
I always tow the line of there's more to stories than what we hear, and that the player is not always 100% to blame. But the comments are here are very unprofessional and he's practically back to square one. Sell him in Jan And I hope we bring in a quality replacement.
Unless there is stuff we don't know about, he's brought a lot of it on himself. In his snaps, he talks about training hard to get back into the team and staying quiet, but completely contradicts himself. This kind of distraction and disruption is not what we need, right before a game.
Sakho has acted like a clown since, too many stories about his antics (has he spent too much time with Balotelli), since Klopp arrived. Guys a numpty, supposed to impress your new manager with professionalism and dedication to prove you're worth keeping. Lallana has shown the way its supposed to be done.
For me the one most obvious thing is that any of this should be a frank discussion between men. Manager to player. Man to man in the office. If he thinks hes a ****ing warrior he should man up and get in that office and thrash it out. If hes not been told to his face the score ok but i honestly doubt it. He was told to go on loan. This message is i'm fit to play and i'm not even allowed to play for the u23s. Either 1. Hes frozen out. He can see can walk back in having missed football too. 2. Hes not as fit as he thinks he is and medical say hes not ready. 3. Hes continued to be a dick behind the scenes and we dont know whats been happening recently. All i know is hes been pictured a lot by the club website laughing and all happy.. so... i dunno whats the story... has he been just doing what he has done all along and its not the level klopp wants. Who knows. We will only find out in the wash but imo he will never wear red again.
Doesn't matter. Whatever the explanation there must be a valid reason for Klopp to be treating him the way he is. The manager is god in these circumstances and whatever he says goes. The player needs to be professional, do his job, keep his head down and his gob shut. If he has issues with the way he is treated then he should bring them up in the correct manner, with the right people - not whinge on social media. It's the same old story with footballers and these outlets. Professional footballers should just be kept in a cellar and only let out to play or train. There's plenty of time to be a spoilt kid when they retire.
I agree with that if both party's do the same. If the manager/club is making public statements that he is not fit when he actually is, then the player has a right to reply. Especially if (as indicated in his post) he has not been given a reason for being denied playing time at any level (surely this would aid fitness if that was a problem?). I just think Klopp has come to the same decision I did 12 months ago, Sakho isn't good enough and Can is a bench player at this level. The thing is, he should have the balls to tell Sakho that.
So a manager has to go into every single press conference and say what.. no comment? Utter rot. The first and last place to deal with it is in the office man to man. Resorting to social media and spouting ****e like scouse warrior... get to ****. As for all of the rest. Seems you woyld like to belive the clown 100% so you can have a go at klopp with it.. thats the real story.
Or Sakho has ****ed around on pre-season which is what everyone knows and Klopp is taking no **** and in the mean time the 3 other CB's have all settled well so Sakho hasn't been needed. While Can has been injured and is working his way back to full fitness.
Nope, a manager (if asked about team selection) should just say "this is the team I think is best for todays game". Why make up excuses about fitness or none existent injuries?