The Leicester City "spiral" watch!

No

 

I knew it

 

Grass!

 

The biggest fcuk up that Pixie has committed (and lord knows there are quite a few of them to choose from!) is that, by putting me on IGNORE, he has, rather ironically, demonstrated his obsession with me! In years to come, criminal psychologists will use Pixie as a case-study.

 

please log in to view this image

 

You know what? That probably isn't a million miles away from how it's going to end up!

 

I take it HIAG is mentioning me again

 

HIAG do you not have PISKIE on ignore too?
Because that was the deal!

#bottlerpart2therevenge

 

Yeah, like you can find the post where I agreed to that!

What you will find, most definitely, is a post - perhaps even two or three - in which Pixie bottles the challenge that I put for the both of us, and which I will keep open. The silly ****er put himself on IGNORE in the hope that it will deflect attention away from his monumental bottle-job. It won't, of course.

 

On the contrary Welch, he as demonstrated restraint yet you never miss a chance to bad mouth him. This post shows everybody the depth of your obsession. He can walk away but you cannot you're now a clown without a circus and I can feel your pain and anguish.

 

He's welched it again. I can also see from the responses that he's welched his own agreement not to mention me.

 

But I'm on ignore! But wait........ Ripped!

Fixed

 

... just out of interest - why would you think anybody would accept another bet or challenge with you? ... your track record would make it pointless ... if you were to win you'd be crowing endlessly and getting all hissy if you weren't getting a sufficient fix from it ... if you lose you'd welch on the terms and try to justify it on the grounds that the winner was being mean in celebrating their victory ... that is the reality because you have done just that ...

...now personally, despite all of the above, I'd take the bet if it was someting I believed in or felt strongly about - because it iwould also be further opportunity to witness another mardy arsed melt from you ,,, which frankly has been quite hilarious to witness... and must have had the vast majority of 'the lads' chuckling....

... you are the kid at school that couldn't get a game of footie unless he brought the ball and then threatens to end the game and take it home with him if the other kids don't let him win ... in a kid you can make some allowances ... in a grown man it is sadly pathetic ... and no amount of gifs, jpegs or other attachments change that. ...

... can't speak for others but personally I've found your behaviour over Betgate to be most disappointing ... you've still got a few Spurs fans clinging on your coat tails because the focus of your continued petualnt ire is an Arsenal fan that has done his fair share of wumming your team ... but you've lost a lot of respect from a lot of non Spurs and non Arsenal fans .... you'll prate that you are not bothereed and that this an internet forum full of strangers etc etc ... but you are kidding yourself - this is a huge part of your life - you are on here at all hours and take a lot of time and pleasure in concocting the wind up posts you make ...

I even find myself feeling a little sorry for you ... because underneath the bravado you know that the above is apposite.

Still time to man-up mate - why not do it?

 

Sadly this is he Fosse

 

Nice wum attempt, Bambi, but sadly not good enough.

Your main problem is the fact that I first offered this challenge several years ago, long before "bet-gate." I offered it several times, in fact, and Pixie refused it each and every time. I offered the challenge because, as with now, the man became a pest, with his obsession of me reaching dangerously psychotic levels, and ruining this site for many users.

Secondly, as many others have pointed out, even if you do genuinely believe that I "welched" on a bet (which, of course, I have not), that is no reason for Pixie not to accept my challenge: if I "welch" again, there would be absolutely no where for me to turn, and I would fully expect all of my many supporters to disown me - for my detractors, that must, surely, be something they would be salivating over? The fact that my detractors do not want the challenge to go ahead is ample proof to anyone with half a brain that they know that Pixie will be unable to honour it.

Of course, if the challenge is accepted, and both sides honour their side of it, that can only be good news for this forum.

The challenge, if it is properly adhered to, produces only one winner - this forum. I cannot see how anyone who genuinely has this forum's interests at heart, should not support the challenge.

If either I or Pixie fail to adhere to the challenge, I would expect that person to be rightly rounded on by every decent poster on this forum.

Actually, I was in the first XI for football, the first XI for cricket, and the first XV for rugby, at my school. I was also one the school's best athletes and swimmers, competing at County level.

Agreed. You speak only for a very small band of posters who support Pixie's disruptive behaviour, and the majority of posters on this board are fed up with it.

That's very nice of you, Bambi, but you really do not have to.

 

Detailed proof of the depth of the rattling you've put him through Fosse.

#rinsed

 

I can't see what Skiddy has written as I have him on IGNORE, but could someone please suggest to him that the reasoned and considered nature of my response to Bambi's overt wummery and morally bankrupt stance more than amply demonstrates how relaxed I am about the entire subject?

Cheers.

 

FFS can we stop giving each other nicknames, I am finding it hard to keep up with who the **** you are all talking about?
Bambi?
Danish?
Welch?

 

HIAG (and HIAG alone) calls me Bambi for some reason - losely revolving around him posting some rather disturbingly bad taste annotation on images from that particular Disney film - as with most things that HIAG does this was a rather petulant reaction / unoriginal attempt at deflection, him flipping at the gentle humour in certain Rupert the bear images that I had posted in reference to one of HIAG's earliest love interests - possibly at public school ... Bambi was apparently meant to reflect my naivety in regard to my football team last season when I was giving it a bit large on what my football team might acheive etc - unfortunately for HIAG he seemed to have missed the fact that Bambi goes on to become the King of The Forest by the end of the film - ironically prophetic as Leicester City went on to conquer all before them indeed, arguably the only' prediction' of HIAG's that has actually come to fruition to date

Danish - is a reference to Spurlock that I suspect relates to bacon - given Spurlock's religion etc

Welch - is HIAG - based on his lamentable and ignominious failure to face up to honouring a bet - leading to public ridicule and humiliation and culminating in his intransigent obstinacy and inability to accept responsibility .. personally I prefer 'Dildo Sackfull-Blaggins' as his nickname ... but then I would - as I coined it .... following on from his colossal faux pas in admitting to spending time 'fingering' said appliances (I kid you not) ..