The EU debate - Part II

You made the claim in post 3430 of this thread. "All that I've seen from leave voters has been nonsense. They've been duped by a group of ultra-rich arseholes".

 

And you made the claim that voters hadn't been influenced in 3422, which is eight posts earlier:
http://www.not606.com/threads/the-eu-debate-part-ii.332715/page-172#post-9654944

Your claim. You back it up.

 

And as I said earlier I haven't been influenced by it. Nor has any of the other voters I know. So there's quite a few voters that were not influenced by it.

Now, unless you're continuing to simply dismiss my reasons as nonsense, your own claim doesn't stand up.

 

Prove it.

 

I'm a voter, I wasn't influenced.

Your shout, as I added to my other reply.

Edit, I recall in a similar debate on the other EU thread, other posters saying the same, that they were voters, and not influenced by it either.

 

You haven't proven anything. You've made a claim. You've then made another claim. That's it.
Stop trying to shift the burden of proof and support your claim, please.

 

I am my own proof. I've stated quite clearly I'm a voter and I wasn't influenced. I seem to recall others on the other thread made the self and same declaration, which is also proof beyond an opinion poll.

It seems all you have is a need to dismiss peoples decisions and reasons if they don't match your preconceptions, and an inability to support your own spurious claims.

With that example, thank heavens your sort lost.

 

You think that some people making an unsubstantiated claim on an internet site is proof of something.
Not just proof, but better evidence than a poll done by a professional company.
This should worry you.

You've also consistently ignored what other people have said about people that they know, while relying on the same evidence for your own claims.
You accept anything that supports your own conclusions, yet deny the same evidence if it doesn't.

You made the spurious claim. You can't support it. Sorry.

 

Nonsense. You made a claim that simply doesn't stand up.

There seems to be a trend with remainers to arrogantly assume they know better than others why we voted as we did.

I outlined my reasons, you've pompously dismissed them and tried to imply I voted on some other criteria. That's simply your imagination at play.

No doubt you'll continue to imply we're all naive and duped by the lies, whereas you superior remain voters didn't buy any of the lies from project fear.

During the programme covering the elections, some remain politicians started to realise, and said that it was a mistake by their campaign, to try to scare people into thinking they'd lose something they didn't have in the first place.

 

We've already established that you were the one that made the claim. You've failed to support it.
You've also failed to supply any lies from the remain campaign, despite being asked for specific ones.

It's quite funny that you've actually demolished your own claim with this comment and failed to realise it.
You weren't influenced by the Leave campaign? Why are you talking about Project Fear, then? That was a part of it.

I'm off to bed now. Try not to post too much crap in my absence, ok?

 

You keep saying I established it, but me posting your quote seems to dispute that.

I posted the misinformation from the remain camp earlier, and mentioned it again in one or two other posts.

The only claim demolished is yours, and you keep on helping prove my claim that some remainers on here will just keep telling us leave voters why we really made the decision we did, despite any evidence to the contrary.

I mention project fear, because that was the name given to the information you remain voters seem to lay such heavy store by. I read it, as I read the other stuff. I treat it for what it was, but considered it in case it changed my views. It didn't. My considered reasons for voting were the same as I outlined earlier, and that you pompously keep trying to dismiss.

 

****ing funny thread to read when your stoned.

 

I watched a programme about string theory and parallel universes when I was stoned. It was an amazing experience.

 

I was not influenced by it

 

The mechanism for drawdown is universal you know nothing.

As usual no answer to the actual question posed I see. I'll wait....

 

Yeah because you'd already made your mind up, as you made your decision on wanting to protect your whites only village

 

He can't admit he's wrong, he's the all knowing being.

Amazing that he's managed to achieve that status from his council desk in Hull

 

Ironically, for such a racist bigot, he's so full of **** that he must surely have dark brown eyes and skin!...

 

Sorry Hull, looks to me like you dug a hole and then fell in.