If thats true we've been dry bummed worse than bummers would do to Fiona Bruce.
He's a great player, I'm well chuffed if this one turns out to be true.
If thats true we've been dry bummed worse than bummers would do to Fiona Bruce.
I don't think £10m for Hendrick. His probable real value is £7-8m, we're known as being desperate and there's less than 3 days to the end of the window. Prices are bound to go up.
I agree. I'd prefer him to Mason I think, just.He's a great player, I'm well chuffed if this one turns out to be true.
ten million for Hendrick!!!! Christ bummers . [HASHTAG]#pray[/HASHTAG] for fionaYou haven't seen me in dry bumming action.
where does a number 10 play?
Is this because Mason is off to Sunderland?I agree. I'd prefer him to Mason I think, just.
Perhaps its spec due to the mason transfer not being completedBurnsy's just tweeted that City are playing down the Hendricks story.
Behind the striker? Which is where Henriksson is meant to play?
I hate reference to 'number 10' or 'number nine' roles. Nobody ever said "oh he's better in the classic number 3 role".
Sorry. Mason apparently plays his best football in an advanced midfield role behind the striker. So it would be interesting to see where we use him if he and Henriksson aren't competing for the same spot in the team.
Burnsy's just tweeted that City are playing down the Hendricks story.
Hendricks a preparing for the Championship signing.
It was said yesterday that Sunderland was looking elsewhere? So it has nothing to do with it.Is this because Mason is off to Sunderland?
He's a great player, I'm well chuffed if this one turns out to be true.
With Livermore, Hudd, Clucas, Meyler we hardly need to strengthen there if we have a shortage of cash and more importantly time. When we're crying out for strengthening in other areas.Hendrick and Hughes are both Premier League players in waiting.
Burnsy's just tweeted that City are playing down the Hendrick story.
