No new manager

  • Please bear with us on the new site integration and fixing any known bugs over the coming days. If you can not log in please try resetting your password and check your spam box. If you have tried these steps and are still struggling email [email protected] with your username/registered email address
  • Log in now to remove adverts - no adverts at all to registered members!
How do Sunderland appoint a manager in double quick time? Yet our ****wit owner who by his own admission said should Bruce have got the England job then we had a contingency to appoint someone quickly - nearly 2 weeks on and still no manager. ****wit an absolute clueless ****wit.
I think regardless of Bruce and England, Ehab probably wanted him gone anyway if all the rumours are true. So I'm not sure looking for a new manager only goes as far back as Bruce leaving which makes it worse.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: GLP
How do Sunderland appoint a manager in double quick time? Yet our ****wit owner who by his own admission said should Bruce have got the England job then we had a contingency to appoint someone quickly - nearly 2 weeks on and still no manager. ****wit an absolute clueless ****wit.

Nobody wants to work for Escab - his contingency plan includes seeing who will take the job for the lowest amount of money, won't make waves over the lack of signings and will tell the press how wonderful his employers are!
 
Least whilst we're manager-less, the lads seem to be getting on really well on Austria. Great team spirit.
 
I feel bad for Phelan, He knows he's way down the list and almost a last resort... I hope he tells the Allams to get ****ed if they end up offering him the job.
 
Maybe one of the reasons Sunderland appointed a manager faster than us is because we are the least attractive Premier League club to take on.
  1. We only just managed promotion via the play offs
  2. We are relegation favourites
  3. We are in the middle of a potential take-over (with no guarantee the new owner will want them in charge)
  4. There isn't likely to be much transfer money available from the out-going owners.
  5. The club has a notoriously negative atmosphere with fans and owners at each others throats.
  6. The club might not be sold, meaning more of the same with no prospect of improvement.
People are disappointed managers aren't clawing the door down for the job, but in reality we're lucky to still be looking at decent quality options instead of Warnock, McLaren, Evans etc.
 
Not really. Just don't know what you saying you were light enough to float over my head meant. Full of hot air or summat?

If you want a petty squabble, you're going to have to do better than these piss poor efforts.

If I don't reply to you for a while, it's not that I'm ignoring you, I'm just prioritising.
 
Maybe one of the reasons Sunderland appointed a manager faster than us is because we are the least attractive Premier League club to take on.
  1. We only just managed promotion via the play offs
  2. We are relegation favourites
  3. We are in the middle of a potential take-over (with no guarantee the new owner will want them in charge)
  4. There isn't likely to be much transfer money available from the out-going owners.
  5. The club has a notoriously negative atmosphere with fans and owners at each others throats.
  6. The club might not be sold, meaning more of the same with no prospect of improvement.
People are disappointed managers aren't clawing the door down for the job, but in reality we're lucky to still be looking at decent quality options instead of Warnock, McLaren, Evans etc.

I've been looking at a Ferrari but I'll end up with a lada
 
Maybe one of the reasons Sunderland appointed a manager faster than us is because we are the least attractive Premier League club to take on.
  1. We are owned by the Allams.
People are disappointed managers aren't clawing the door down for the job, but in reality we're lucky to still be looking at decent quality options instead of Warnock, McLaren, Evans etc.

The concise version :emoticon-0105-wink: