Haha that I'll grant you. Just not sure I can see him staying without a budget or any new players. It's going to be a complete mess. Part of me is still hoping we're just holding back signing announcements to make a big splash, since we've heard nothing about Sane or Robson-Kanu for days now.
After all that's gone off at the club , it would not surprise me if SB walked and the Allams installed "Roary the tiger" as the new manager.
By all accounts?????? It would be good if you would provide a single bona fide account that has prompted you to start this thread. Otherwise this is mere speculative tabloid tattle.
Why wouldn't SB consider his position? He will have been targets and objectives that he has to hit for this season. He has taken those and planned for signings that would help him achieve these expectations - yet the owners are not committing to these. Basically, it is constructive dismissal
Where has this actually come from? Has the OP got a source? I can think of a lot of reasons for Bruce to be unhappy, but this doesn't seem be backed by anyone other than a poster on here. Any elaborations?
Hull City boss Steve Bruce has been dealt a blow with the Tigers board limiting him to free transfers only, the Sun reports (Friday edition, page 54). It is claimed the newly-promoted side do not want to fork out for fee-paying transfers amid uncertainty over a proposed takeover at the KC Stadium
You are a wag City Man... ... thank you for the accolade.. but if you are going to 'quote' use the whole piece not the piece that suits your erection purposes.
