S
Spur of the Moment
Guest
You probably wasted the previous 2 paragraphs.......A total shambles

You probably wasted the previous 2 paragraphs.......A total shambles

Compared to Iceland? Really?The bottom line is that England don't have good enough players.
The bottom line is that England don't have good enough players. There were a few young players in the squad, who have emerged since the World Cup debacle, but England still play in the same disjointed, "lump it in and hope for the best" way. We continue to lack players with a good first touch, who are able to pass and move coherently and are clever enough to to find space and time or the bit of skill or class which gives the better teams the edge (for example Griezmann's timely intervention yesterday for France).
Some of our players look good a club level because they have star players around them who provide that coherence or creavity, which enables them to shine. When you put the England players together in the same team their lack of real ability is painfully obvious - as has been shown tournament after tournament. We revert to trying to wear down the opposition by lumping the ball into the box as often as possible, but teams are wise to this now - and all the teams are very organised. Wales and Iceland are proof that good organisation and playing to a plan can compensate for lack of ability to some extent. Unfortunately, England lack organisation too. The players don't play to a plan, nobody seems to know what their roles are (how do Kane, Vardy, Sturridge, Rooney and Alli all fit together?) and the personnel changes so often that there is no understanding.
A total shambles.
Maybe Hodgson should've picked more Arsenal players?
He could've had, erm... that, wait no, he's Welsh. Er...
That's partisan. Wilshere was awful, along with the rest of them. Rashford looked good but didn't have enough tme.I thought Rooney looked good in the first half but in the second half he went to absolute ****, literally everything he did was terrible, lost his touch, poor passing, poor decision making, slowed the game down. The pressure got to him as the experienced player and it showed. Terrible second half performance from him.
I thought Wilshere and Rashford are the only two players who can be happy with there contribution today, the rest of the team were just awful in every way possible.
Everyone was ****. I don't think that's a coincidence.Welbeck would of gone if he wasn't injured I think. Oxo and Walcott didn't have good seasons and there were othe oacey options available. Wilshere I thought did well today despite his lack of game time over the season. So I don't disagree about there not being Arsenal options to go for. The Spurs lot were **** though today.
Welbeck would of gone if he wasn't injured I think. Oxo and Walcott didn't have good seasons and there were othe oacey options available. Wilshere I thought did well today despite his lack of game time over the season. So I don't disagree about there not being Arsenal options to go for. The Spurs lot were **** though today.
Can't disagree, Luke. The lack of basic skills in some of them is appalling.
As to line ups and permutations of, that's down to clueless Woy.
Compared to Iceland? Really?
not try and shoehorn players into teams and squads because we feel they should be there for some reason.
Everyone was ****. I don't think that's a coincidence.
Ramsey's been ****ing awful all tournament too, by the way. That's even if you ignore his haircut.
In the second half today the inability to do even the most basic things was absolutely embarrassing for all them. And how does Hodgson hit this far into a tournament and this long into his job and not know his best team or who plays well together?
The bottom line is that England don't have good enough players. There were a few young players in the squad, who have emerged since the World Cup debacle, but England still play in the same disjointed, "lump it in and hope for the best" way. We continue to lack players with a good first touch, who are able to pass and move coherently and are clever enough to to find space and time or the bit of skill or class which gives the better teams the edge (for example Griezmann's timely intervention yesterday for France).
Some of our players look good a club level because they have star players around them who provide that coherence or creavity, which enables them to shine. When you put the England players together in the same team their lack of real ability is painfully obvious - as has been shown tournament after tournament. We revert to trying to wear down the opposition by lumping the ball into the box as often as possible, but teams are wise to this now - and all the teams are very organised. Wales and Iceland are proof that good organisation and playing to a plan can compensate for lack of ability to some extent. Unfortunately, England lack organisation too. The players don't play to a plan, nobody seems to know what their roles are (how do Kane, Vardy, Sturridge, Rooney and Alli all fit together?) and the personnel changes so often that there is no understanding.
A total shambles.
Thats because he's the only winger in the squad! Everyone else is a 10 or a striker!
Imagine needing an inspirational team talk and Roy is in the dressing room
You warming up for next year?So there you have the English playing without their European team mates.
Good luck for the future.
That's partisan. Wilshere was awful, along with the rest of them. Rashford looked good but didn't have enough tme.
Players need to take responsibility on the pitch and management need to take responsibility off it and be prepared to make harsh calls (see England rugby for an example of this turnaround - not the first time we'll hear that comparison over the coming weeks I bet).
And that's nothing to do with the players available, in my opinion.Not good enough to progress to the latter stages of a tournament.
And certainly not good enough to beat Iceland tonight.