I think the role of a leader is to give leadership, not just represent the views of his electorate. I accept that Corbyn hasn't taken his electorate with him, but having an ideology which most of the Labour Party's natural supporters could be persuaded to vote for by the right person is surely what a Labour leader is all about? The last leader of the traditional soft left version of the LP was John Smith, whose ideology wasn't that different from Corbyn's. If only he hadn't tragically died before he could face a General Election we would have been spared the Blair fiasco which was the real reason Labour lost its way.I am really not sure what to think of the Corbyn stuff. He offers ideology where British politics is a vacuum - yet if you really think what ideology it is, it is the ideology of students on rallies and not the ideology of the working man. In other words, he doesn't represent real working class people. In fact, he represents middle class student lefties... He's a **** leader and he is hamstrung by having pretended to be pro-Remain, when his Leave nature could have been a strength and made the referendum vote a victory for him.
I'd have a massive problem with Dianne Abbott. Christ no, not her, are you mad? ****it, have a beer on me 
this is the ideal time for Labour to install a "leader" and come up with some real policies. Especially if, as rumoured, Boris calls an immediate election. There are going to be a lot of people, who abandoned Labour at the last General Election, who will remember only too clearly, the lies Boris and his Brexiteers brought to the EU Referendum.