That crocodile ate a women by all accounts, maybe he was in the same location and suffered a similar fate.
Have you seen the local MP's comments about it? (Crocodile related tourism is quite important to the area and it's part of him saying they shouldn't go daft and start getting rid of the crocs)
“You can’t legislate against human stupidity. This is a tragedy but it was avoidable. There are warning signs everywhere up there.You can only get there by ferry, and there are signs there saying watch out for the bloody crocodiles. If you go in swimming at 10 o’clock at night, you’re going to get consumed.”
He has a point. Same with that gorilla ending up being killed.
Maybe he just needed a ****? Have I got it wrong again?Just searched him and nothing came up. Don't understand why he'd defect like that?
Surely, if a four year old can find his way into a deadly animals cage, it's the zoo at fault?He has a point. Same with that gorilla ending up being killed.
Surely, if a four year old can find his way into a deadly animals cage, it's the zoo at fault?
It should be impossible for that to happen?
Where's Roo? What have done with him?Depends how far you can throw one.
Too soon?![]()
Surely, if a four year old can find his way into a deadly animals cage, it's the zoo at fault?
It should be impossible for that to happen?
Honestly Castro? I can't watch.The child was heard saying to his parents he wanted to go in there. What were they doing?
Watch the video the gorilla seems fascinated by him being protective and holding his hand. It really is sad.
Honestly Castro? I can't watch.
Tranquiliser would have risked enraging him and have him attack the kid before it had any effect.Try and have a look. I am a bit of a softie about these things but forced myself. Remembering those scenes of the group of gorillas with Attenborough and their gentleness and interest in him it makes it even sadder as I don't think it would have harmed him and a tranquilliser dart would possibly have done the trick.
That crocodile ate a women by all accounts, maybe he was in the same location and suffered a similar fate.
Try and have a look. I am a bit of a softie about these things but forced myself. Remembering those scenes of the group of gorillas with Attenborough and their gentleness and interest in him it makes it even sadder as I don't think it would have harmed him and a tranquilliser dart would possibly have done the trick.
Tranquiliser would have risked enraging him and have him attack the kid before it had any effect.
Can't really point fingers at the zoo staff. There was a little boy's life on the line and had he got pummelled to death by a gorilla, they would have a lot more to answer for. Whether you agree with it or not, legally and morally an innocent child's life and wellbeing takes priority.
Considering he was in there 10 minutes im sure the staff would have thought about every possible option and felt they had no choice. They wouldn't have wanted to shoot him any more than you would.
I certainly agree the Gorilla had to be shot. But like I said earlier, it should have been impossible for the child to get in there?Can't really point fingers at the zoo staff. There was a little boy's life on the line and had he got pummelled to death by a gorilla, they would have a lot more to answer for. Whether you agree with it or not, legally and morally an innocent child's life and wellbeing takes priority.
Considering he was in there 10 minutes im sure the staff would have thought about every possible option and felt they had no choice. They wouldn't have wanted to shoot him any more than you would.