By that logic then, him previously being relegated means **** all too.
Or does that not fit your argument?
Steve Bruce
- Thread starter Chazz Rheinhold
- Start date
-
Please bear with us on the new site integration and fixing any known bugs over the coming days. If you can not log in please try resetting your password and check your spam box. If you have tried these steps and are still struggling email [email protected] with your username/registered email address
-
By that logic then, him previously being relegated means **** all too.
Or does that not fit your argument?
Because it's a way to try and enhance that person's argument. If they wanted to keep Bruce, they'd be saying the same thing you are now.
So we ignore his past achievement and record, in favour of the record of a guy just sacked.
If past history is ignored, what do you base a decision for manager on?
I really dont have another manager, and as it isnt my choice, I just think we should get rid of SB
are you honestly telling me that you are happy with his decisions and his tactics?
when I get paid the megabucks to pick a manager, I will choose 1.
but up until then....
I dont HAVE to be happy with our manager
Yes, because you say poorly thought out ****e like this...
...and have people call BS on you, at which point you spit the dummy out.
Oh, and by the way, ALL of those managers bar Pearson have regularly finished midtable in the Prem in the past.
Though that doesn't matter, as they are PAST achievements, which in your own words, have no bearing.
So playing in a negative atmosphere in a half full stadium with all manner of off-field bullshit distractions wouldn't affect our chances then? Allams going and being replaced by owners who actually give a **** about the fans would a more positive impact on our chances than whether Bruce stays or not for me.
Have a look at the Premier league table for next year. Have a look around message boards and find a manager other than Leicester's that the fans are universally happy with, then come back with a suggestion for a replacement.
Yes, because you say poorly thought out ****e like this...
...and have people call BS on you, at which point you spit the dummy out.
Oh, and by the way, ALL of those managers bar Pearson have regularly finished midtable in the Prem in the past.
Though that doesn't matter, as they are PAST achievements, which in your own words, have no bearing.
how long ago were his Birmingham achievements?
but that doesnt seem to matter to you.
I guess having no experience means **** all nowadays. Let's just get some ****er who has played Football Manager for a few hundred hours, see how far we get.
The fact you can't come up with a replacement or offer a proper answer to DMD says it all.
unfortunately getting rid of the owners doesn't stop Brucie serving up some of the negative **** that has driven fans away this season - some of our performances have been truly awful and that is entirely down to Bruce deciding to defend at all costs rather than press forward - our most recent performances against Rotherham, Derby away and Wednesday demonstrated how we can play with the squad we have if he allows the players to push forward - our performance against Derby at home shows how ****e we can be if he tells the players to hold back - we got promotion because we had by far the best squad in the division - we nearly ****ed it up because it wasn't used to its potential on too many occasions and we had to do it the hard way
So now it is up to me to choose a manager? just cos DMD has demanded that I do?
cos I dont have a manager lined up, we should stick with SB?
I dont get paid enough.
and he got us relegated last time we were in the Prem - and bearing in mind how much he spent we should have been well away from the bottom 3
Bruce looks at us as being very small too, and talks about how 'big' clubs should employ English managers when asked about his own position.