Sometimes laughter is the best medicine
- Thread starter Medro
- Start date
-
Please bear with us on the new site integration and fixing any known bugs over the coming days. If you can not log in please try resetting your password and check your spam box. If you have tried these steps and are still struggling email [email protected] with your username/registered email address
-
Raging
Aye, I always boil over when someone talks a lot of ****e, especially someone who is "a mendacious witness whose evidence should not be accepted on any issue unless it is supported by documents or other objective evidence” .
I like Dave KingAnd as if any evidence was ever required Dave shows what an absolute fudstick he really is.
As Pud says, King is pandering to cretins.
losing it completely. Calm doon Dev i was only joking.Aye, I always boil over when someone talks a lot of ****e, especially someone who is "a mendacious witness whose evidence should not be accepted on any issue unless it is supported by documents or other objective evidence” .
The guy is a personality vacuum, have you ever seen a photo of him relaxing or smiling? I don't think i've ever seen him wearing anything but a blazer and tie, he must be a right hoot at parties.
"He is extremely arrogant and obviously thinks that whatever he says is so.”
“He deliberately misrepresented the facts of the case to his legal representatives. Mr King agreed that… he did not want (his) South African legal representatives to know all the facts. He said that this was not necessary.”
“When confronted by what he said at the enquiry, Mr King contended that the record was materially defective & did not correctly reflect what he said. He then conceded that he had been furnished with a copy of the recording, that he had been invited to point out where the transcript was wrong and that he (and presumably his attorney) had not done so.”
“As his evidence progressed, it became clear that he has no respect for the truth and does not hesitate to lie, or at least misrepresent the facts, if he thinks it will be to his advantage”
“There can be little doubt that on most occasions Mr King lied, as he knew the correct facts and obviously decided to misrepresent these facts.”
“In cross-examination, (King) often avoided giving a proper answer to the questions. Sometimes he simply ignored the point of the question and gave a long, rambling answer.” But “on other occasions”he resorted to bluster or to attacking the integrity of the cross-examiner, accusing him of misrepresenting the facts".
"a mendacious witness whose evidence should not be accepted on any issue unless it is supported by documents or other objective evidence.”
“Mr King contradicted himself about whether he had a loan account,”
“not only is his evidence vague and unsubstantiated, but it makes no sense and is improbable,”
“Mr King denied that he did this, when it is clear that he did.”
“When asked to testify about specific transactions he clearly could not recall any one transaction. He said he may have it at home but he did not produce any document to support the evidence.”
What a guy. The Scottish Donald Trump.
“He deliberately misrepresented the facts of the case to his legal representatives. Mr King agreed that… he did not want (his) South African legal representatives to know all the facts. He said that this was not necessary.”
“When confronted by what he said at the enquiry, Mr King contended that the record was materially defective & did not correctly reflect what he said. He then conceded that he had been furnished with a copy of the recording, that he had been invited to point out where the transcript was wrong and that he (and presumably his attorney) had not done so.”
“As his evidence progressed, it became clear that he has no respect for the truth and does not hesitate to lie, or at least misrepresent the facts, if he thinks it will be to his advantage”
“There can be little doubt that on most occasions Mr King lied, as he knew the correct facts and obviously decided to misrepresent these facts.”
“In cross-examination, (King) often avoided giving a proper answer to the questions. Sometimes he simply ignored the point of the question and gave a long, rambling answer.” But “on other occasions”he resorted to bluster or to attacking the integrity of the cross-examiner, accusing him of misrepresenting the facts".
"a mendacious witness whose evidence should not be accepted on any issue unless it is supported by documents or other objective evidence.”
“Mr King contradicted himself about whether he had a loan account,”
“not only is his evidence vague and unsubstantiated, but it makes no sense and is improbable,”
“Mr King denied that he did this, when it is clear that he did.”
“When asked to testify about specific transactions he clearly could not recall any one transaction. He said he may have it at home but he did not produce any document to support the evidence.”
What a guy. The Scottish Donald Trump.
Brendan Rodgers left his wife,and went to shag a tranny.
He pulled the knickers to the side,
and saw there was no fanny.
It's actually zero titles in a row versus this rangers but okay we will take 1 if he wants
Was it Dermot Desmond who said 5 in a row don't really count?
But wait, don't tell me you are engaging in whatabootery?