Mouser Watch #2

Like Origi was clearly offside for your winner against Dortmund?
Liverpool fans moaning about bent refs is like Donald Trump criticising a bad haircut.

 

whats the dortmund game got to do with a pint of fish?

and i like trumps hair

 

"Straight up robbed by a bent ref, 3, 1st half handballs in the box, one of those was a foul on firminho anyway, regardless of the handball, ****ing joke display from a weak ref who basically won sevilla the game in the 1st half with his lack of testicles in making those clear decisions."

<Jimmy Liddel><I'm not having that, mate>

 

It's almost as if European referees treat Liverpool like any other team - something Premier League refs could learn from...

 

You can't moan about losing because of poor decisions when you only got there via them.
Trump's hair is laughably ****. Bobby Charlton would find it amusing, FFS.

I'm not going to hold my breath.

 

Even the legend himself had nothing to say about the handballs.
Sucky has out-Lidled Liddel.

 

Thats

Look guys i dont expect you to agree with me, i dont need you to

 

It's at times like this that I wish I wasn't banned from the 'Pool board. I'd cheer those lads up with some real banter. No wumming, just a few quips to ease their pain.

 

I'm banned too.

I only went there once!!

Sensitive bunch. It will be for local people only today

please log in to view this image

 

There are a few of us, Little Luke.

I think any non-Mouser who still has a permit to post on the Mouser board has to be considered to be extremely dodgy.

 

I'm a bit stealthy....share some love with them now and again, it throws them off.

 

Haig you being banned is a blessing for you mate, its one less board to that you can get laughed off of. #doinghaigaservice

 

You're saying that out of your deepest respect for me, Sucky. I appreciate it, mate.

 

of course Haig, always looking out for you mate, not like "the lads"

 

I'm a trend-setter, Sucky, you know that. The lads look to me for pointers, and I rarely disappoint.

 

Look to you? mate no one could find you after the newcastle game til this morning i had your back though, while your fellow spuds joined in the mockery of you, me an roofpert had your back mate.

 

Nice try, Sucky. I admire your attempts at wummery. However, i was monitoring the situation from a remote location. I could see that, by and large, my fellow Yids were covering my back. Spurlock - my closest buddy in arms - had my back most of the way. I was surprised at Roofy stepping up - didn't expect that. Then again, they do say that out of adversity springs many a surprise.

 

Haig!! the fact you think im taking the piss is insult enough, but to say that butthurtlock, of all people, had, your, back when i, have clearly been behind you the whole way, many times this season.

and i will no speak of your "dangle berry" either mate honestly im flabbergasted at your lack of faith in our friendship.

 

Sucky your like a friend with benefits. You have a use I'll give you that.

 

I'm sympathetic to any team that suffers from bad refereeing decisions. The subjective opinion of flawed people (as we all are) shouldn't be such an important part of a multi-billion pound industry. Video refs should be the norm, and they should be able to overrule refs on the field. It's where the most senior refs should go that maybe can't keep up with running around on the field. They should have a limited time to do so, but frankly I think the slowing the game down thing is much overdone. The game is often slowed down while the ref consults the assistant refs, or when certain teams surround him. More importantly I want the *correct decision* and if that takes a few seconds longer than so be it. If it isn't clear from the video after a certain time then the video ref can't overrule. It's something I think we'd get used to very quickly and is absolutely not like the game becoming American football. It will still flow, but as I said people that don't want video evidence are effectively saying 'as long as the game flows I don't care if they get the correct decision'. I can't agree with that.

But of course the game is very tribal, which is why I am posting it on this thread. We aren't very sympathetic to Pool with dodgy decisions against them because we remember they haven't been very sympathetic when decisions go against us, or we might think they get their fair share of dodgy decision in their favour. In any event we have a lot of supporters who see decisions going against their own team but aren't much bothered that other teams get dodgy decisions against them. This allows the status quo to be preserved by the 'divide and rule' principle, so the authorities don't have to do anything. What we all should be saying is that we don't want the ref to get it wrong, whoever the decision goes for or against.