What? I just pointed out that he's an important part of a team that's doing well and we miss him badly when he's not playing. How on earth would that make him a very, very expensive flop? That makes no sense.
dunno, it makes no sense to me either, im just going by the other guys logic about expensive flops, as you said lamela has only just turned up this season (his 3rd at spurs?) just saying that if ings is a 8m expensive flop after less than ten games with us due to injury then lamela playing one good season for a 30m fee has to be considered also
To clarify, this is just you saying something right? in the "I'll wind them up" sense rather than actually attempting to articulate an "opinion" you've considered before committing to post?
So what kind move is it secondly? as in, the move that it could have been before it being a business move?
i did, cos he has only turned up this season. he was bought as a like for like replacement for Bale right, well you got a faster more skillful Dirk Kuyt, no shame in that but it is what it is.
we laugh too mate, if we diddnt we'd cry yet for all your table looking and spending charts i do believe you have won exactly nada, so well done on winning nothing?
We bought a bunch of players that summer, so it's media speculation as to what his role was supposed to be. He'd not really clicked until this season, but he was hardly playing like Lallana or something.
Ah, there you are! I'm so glad you weren't trying to pass yourself as having an ounce of credibility. It is a relief to know you really are as we've come to know you, a joyless wum twat. Don't go changing.
come on now you expected him to be a goal machine, thats why you bought him ive seen many time your lot saying just as much. and tbf lallana has hit form for us this season (only his 2nd with us) = better than lamela
Twat? ok dude good for you thats one end of the table to the other, hardly a reasonable comparison is it. if you compare your last 10 years with ours weve both been ****e, only for us its unusual
