You can't hide behind copying my damning assessment of your bottle jobs. Talking of bottle jobs, are you going to bottle this question about how your prediction that Spurs would take all 6 points off of Arsenal this season turned out ?
Tottenham have opened talks over a new contract with manager Mauricio Pochettino. (Daily Mirror) This represents a massive blow to Pixie's potential wum agenda.
If any of you lads want a lie in tomorrow just PM me and I'll do a few copy and pastes and get Wednesday off to a flying start....so it's all set up for when you come on and resume your epic debate.
Just pick from any of the words 'wum-master', 'owned' and 'dummy' and you have HIAGs repertoire right there.
.. thought you'd be too busy wandering around Haringey in your T shirt chirping "wye aye pet" to the local lasses as a prelude to your weekend ... before the crushing disappointment of defeat at Leicester City on MONDAY
Oh, I am under no illusions that Poch will, eventually, move on. I've already conceded that in another thread. I live in the real world, you see, Bambi, whereas you and Pixie seem to live in some alternative dimension where you are funny, and Arsenal don't get spanked by Barca every two years.
I know this is a bit off topic but I was thinking the other day, 'Hoddle Is A God' has got to be the worst username on here. I cringe a little every time I read it. As you were.
It's the kind of username you'd associate with a child, not a 60 year old receptionist. It's also an odd username for an old Spurs fan given Hoddle identifies himself with Chelsea.
HIAG has got an on / off love affair with Chelsea, in typical chav fashion he only sings when they are winning. Also he has a signed picture of Jimmy greaves making his debut for Spurs in 1959 whilst he was still playing for Chelsea.
I don't think HIAG is actually much of a football fan. Working reception can be boring so he needed to find something to fill his days. The rugby forums are probably too quiet and uncontroversial.
If you understood physics, Pixie, you'd know that modern super-string theory posits the concept that all of us exist in multiple dimensions at the same time, where every possible outcome in every possible situation, from micro-second to micro-second, is played out. The point I was making - and which, in your ignorance you clearly have failed to grasp - is that even if I am wrong in this dimension (which I never admitted to), I will be right in another dimension. I never thought that I would have to write this explanation, preferring to believe that you would have understood what I meant, and it saddens me that I was wrong. Next time, I will try to use concepts that are more in keeping with your level of understanding. On that note, I'm going to dig out my infant's old Teletubbies' DVDs.
