Ha! If we do find out who it is, I'd prefer Larry Holmes to sort it, not Sherlock. I don't much like what I'm suspecting any more than you do.
No it would be unfair, just on the of chance i am wrong (which i dont think i am). A lot of clues are already within this thread.
You joined here the same day as me, so have witnessed some of the epic arguments that have occured. Now folks are resorting to guerilla warfare. Sniping from the bushes or leaving dirty bombs. Lets get back to trench warfare Over the top we go lads.
Been reading more than writing lately, but we all know the players well. Been different of late. Not in a good way. Feel bad for Marcus on this one. It will work itself out tho. Nothing ever stays the same.
Yep. Gloves were introduced halfway through John L.'s reign, so he was champ with gloves and without them.
I was just having a quick scan as i didnt have a clue who the **** you were on about. Interesting stuff. Were you there?
Tw*t - no, I wasn't bloody there. Sullivan always fought in knee-length tights, which is where we get the term 'long Johns'. He won the title in 1882 from Jack Flood, a New York gangster. The title wasn't universally recognised though till he beat the Irishman, Jake Kilrain in 1887. Sullivan kept the title till 1892, when he lost it to James J. Corbett.
Sorry couldnt resist. Relic gets me to do more work on this forun than anyone else. He keeps hoying these names up and gets me curious Thank **** for Mr. Google or i'd be ****ed.
Doesn't it just! Upset white society so much that there wasn't another black champ till Joe Louis 21 years later. And even then the top contender was a white - Max Scmelling, who'd already knocked Louis out in 1935. But society would rather even give a title shot to another black man than give it to a German. Off topic - There are three guys here having a pleasant chat. One in California, one in Thailand, and one in England. What an amazing world we live in!