Rich Toff let off for child porn

  • Please bear with us on the new site integration and fixing any known bugs over the coming days. If you can not log in please try resetting your password and check your spam box. If you have tried these steps and are still struggling email [email protected] with your username/registered email address
  • Log in now to remove adverts - no adverts at all to registered members!
RobSpur said:
Out of interest, let's forget for a minute we're in England.

Instead, imagine we are in a new society.

You have been elected as the law making body.

You have to make some laws.

You're making a list of laws, when just at that moment someone tells you a story he'd heard about some guy in his mid 20s, and a 15 year old girl who looks about 19 making out in his car.

The guy thinks nothing of it when he tells you, but to his surprise, you say, "****'s going to jail".

"You what ?" the gossip says. "What for ?"

"For being seduced by the girl", you say.

"That's no a law", the gossip says.

"It ****ing well is", you say.

"What punishment will the man have to do ?", he asks.

You say, "well now. For a start ten year in prison (during which time he will be labelled as a 'nonce' and be tormented and threatened on a daily basis). Also,mhe can never see his daughter again. His daughter shall be made a target for the rest of her childhood. What else ? Oh yeah, if he doesnt top himself while he's inside, then when he gets out he can never work again, and will be the target of abuse wherever he goes for the rest of his life."

"****ing hell", the gossip says. "For making out with that bird who was infatuated with him ?"

""Yes" you say. "that, my friend, is justice."

Now, let's imagine the gossip doesnt run for his life, in case you sentence him to torture for eating his breakfast, and instead he asks you why the **** youve made that law.

What do you say ?
Click to expand...

I have concluded that noone on here is able to satisfactorily explain this in a reasoned manner.
 
Will the baying mob please leave Robspur alone as he is obviously correct and everyone else is wrong
 
  • Like
Reactions: DevAdvocate
Dan Starkey said:
It made perfect sense.
Click to expand...

It didn't though.

I made an unambiguous statement of my opinion, and you said that my opinion might be something else.

There was no indication that what I stated as my opinion was not my opinion.

You comment was (no pun intended) nonsense.

I asked why the punishment fitted the crime. Suggesting that you regard it as something called "nonsing", did nothing to answer the question that I raised.

Whether it did or did not answer the question I had raised though, the comment was totally unfounded as an implication of my opinion, as I had expressed no such opinion, and in fact had stated the opposite.

Your comment was no more than facile, meaningless, gibberish.
 
RobSpur said:
It didn't though.

I made an unambiguous statement of my opinion, and you said that my opinion might be something else.

There was no indication that what I stated as my opinion was not my opinion.

You comment was (no pun intended) nonsense.

I asked why the punishment fitted the crime. Suggesting that you regard it as something called "nonsing", did nothing to answer the question that I raised.

Whether it did or did not answer the question I had raised though, the comment was totally unfounded as an implication of my opinion, as I had expressed no such opinion, and in fact had stated the opposite.

Your comment was no more than facile, meaningless, gibberish.
Click to expand...

<laugh>

Can we keep this guy?
 
I'm pretty sure Dev Robspurt Maltese Mick and Adam Johnson are not the only people on GC that have had sexual relations with under 16s .
Just because Mick married his teen bride doesn't stop it being wrong , unless sex with a 15 year old is legal in Ireland or Malta.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Toby
RobSpur said:
It didn't though.

I made an unambiguous statement of my opinion, and you said that my opinion might be something else.

There was no indication that what I stated as my opinion was not my opinion.

You comment was (no pun intended) nonsense.

I asked why the punishment fitted the crime. Suggesting that you regard it as something called "nonsing", did nothing to answer the question that I raised.

Whether it did or did not answer the question I had raised though, the comment was totally unfounded as an implication of my opinion, as I had expressed no such opinion, and in fact had stated the opposite.

Your comment was no more than facile, meaningless, gibberish.
Click to expand...

He groomed a 14/15 year old girl and you are defending his actions by stating he is the biggest victim in this affair, do you really expect anyone to take you seriously?
 
  • Like
Reactions: Sign Da Ting
RobSpur said:
I have concluded that noone on here is able to satisfactorily explain this in a reasoned manner.
Click to expand...

He sent her 800+ WhatsApp messages ffs, it's not as if she threw herself at him, he was asking her for a shag.

Stop defending kiddy-****ers, he knew the law ffs, he even googled it and went on ahead anyways <doh>

I like smoking ****loads of weed, I know it's illegal, I still choose to do it, if I get caught and sent to prison it's my fault, get it?
 
  • Like
Reactions: A.L.D.O 4.1, Sign Da Ting, bucks_is_leeds and 1 other person
You must log in or register to reply here.
Top Bottom
Back