Off Topic SAFC Not606 Christmas Project

  • Please bear with us on the new site integration and fixing any known bugs over the coming days. If you can not log in please try resetting your password and check your spam box. If you have tried these steps and are still struggling email [email protected] with your username/registered email address
  • Log in now to remove adverts - no adverts at all to registered members!
Gordon Armstrong said:
On a serious note . . . . no :emoticon-0145-shake
I've p.m.d Sid again, this afternoon, following the earlier prompts, and am awaiting a reply :emoticon-0148-yes:
He's been poorly, apparently, and he said that he'll 'sort it' a couple of weeks ago, but he hasn't yet :emoticon-0101-sadsm
Click to expand...

Cheers mate. Not that I'm accusing Sid but it's slightly worrying.

Let us all know when you find out what's happening :emoticon-0148-yes:
 
Typical_Wazza said:
Seems a bit awkward giving them money now given they've been smearing the club in the press today and this is the SAFC board.

Maybe it's just me?
Click to expand...
Typical_Wazza said:
They've not had it yet <laugh>
Click to expand...

Well if the top post is right they can **** off.

If the bottom post is right then..........erm........ they can **** off.

Give the money (wherever it is) to somebody else.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Dispicable_Tel
Typical_Wazza said:
I feel this may gather pace.
Click to expand...

They have own their agenda to protect women and girls from abusive men. How they go about their business in the public arena, asking organisations to account for themselves, or whatever, isn't my concern. It's not for me to question their actions in this situation.

What they do day-to-day, looking after abused women and kids is reason enough for me for them still to receive the money if they haven't already done so. There are kids living in their hostels who can still benefit from the money.
 
  • Like
Reactions: MackemInTheMiddle, Deleted, Brian Storm and 4 others
Blunham Mackem said:
They have own their agenda to protect women and girls from abusive men. How they go about their business in the public arena, asking organisations to account for themselves, or whatever, isn't my concern. It's not for me to question their actions in this situation.

What they do day-to-day, looking after abused women and kids is reason enough for me for them still to receive the money if they haven't already done so. There are kids living in their hostels who can still benefit from the money.
Click to expand...

That`s fair enough. <ok>

When I get my 10k (like Terry says) I`ll give them the £10 I gave before.

Too soft me like. Generous to a fault.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Dispicable_Tel
Blunham Mackem said:
They have own their agenda to protect women and girls from abusive men. How they go about their business in the public arena, asking organisations to account for themselves, or whatever, isn't my concern. It's not for me to question their actions in this situation.

What they do day-to-day, looking after abused women and kids is reason enough for me for them still to receive the money if they haven't already done so. There are kids living in their hostels who can still benefit from the money.
Click to expand...

I support this man's view. We shouldn't punish the little boys, girls and women because the charity is run by a feminist media whore. She also made a big fuss about 50 shades of gray for those who don't know.

Stick to the plan, once Sid is on his feet again and joking aside we all wish Sid all the best and we hope to see you back on here soon.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Brian Storm and grandpops
You must log in or register to reply here.
Top Bottom
Back