Norwich v Chelsea

  • Please bear with us on the new site integration and fixing any known bugs over the coming days. If you can not log in please try resetting your password and check your spam box. If you have tried these steps and are still struggling email [email protected] with your username/registered email address
  • Log in now to remove adverts - no adverts at all to registered members!
K E M P said:
To play a 4-4-2 at this level against a 5 man midfield, which most teams play at this level you have to have a VERY solid defence and also a **** hot midfield that puts in a shift both attacking wise and defensively, wingers included. Nuff said.
Click to expand...

That is why some were scared but ask the question - did Chelsea over-run us with their midfield 5 when City changed to 4-4-2? I think the answer is - no, they did not and that has been the case in each game when we have played that way.

I would not play it for away games but at home I definitely would
 
  • Like
Reactions: JM Fan
ThaiCanary said:
That is why some were scared but ask the question - did Chelsea over-run us with their midfield 5 when City changed to 4-4-2? I think the answer is - no, they did not and that has been the case in each game when we have played that way.

I would not play it for away games but at home I definitely would
Click to expand...

I said to the fan next to me at the start of the 2nd half - I hope we go for 2 strikers on the hour mark and no, we weren't overrun. Had it not been for the offside goal ......
 
royalbarclayfan said:
Yes, but who here in their right mind had actually expected us to beat Chelsea, with or without schoolboy defending, I certainly hadn´t and it´s all very well calling for Neil´s head, but who do you honestly expect would come in and be able to turn things around, at a price the board would be willing/able to pay?

17th position is where we´ve always been aiming, and that´s still the target, otherwise we´re likely to be yo-yoing for a few seasons more yet, I´m afraid.
Click to expand...

Do you seriously think that 1 point from the last 27 is acceptable? I don't!
 
  • Like
Reactions: KIO
Has anyone heard anything on why Naismith wasn't even on the bench? If it was anything other than resting him, that could be a real concern for Swansea given that Tettey is looking a doubt and with out him we definitely have a soft underbelly. On top of that you would hope that O'neil and Brady would be OK to play following their collision, but these footballers ain't so tough these days. All things considered I reckon the predictions league will be as tough as ever on Saturday.

Bah!
 
ilovedelia said:
Do you seriously think that 1 point from the last 27 is acceptable? I don't!
Click to expand...

No I don´t think it´s acceptable, but nor is it in any way surprising, considering where we´ve come from, and the sort of financial clout we´re competing against. As I said, right from the beginning of the season, we´ve been scrapping for that 17 th place, and we really can´t expect an awful lot more in our first season back. Actually the last two have been vastly improved performances on the previous five or six, and we could easily have had at least two pts, and should justly have had one, if the linesman had done his job properly last night. Play like that against Swansea, Newcastle and Sunderland, which are the games we have to do it in, and we might easily take all nine pts, which would help our cause no end.

Changing the manager now, especially after the last two encouraging performances, would be ludicrous, even if we could pick up someone vaguely competent, which is by no means a foregone conclusion.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: Canary Rob
Cromercanary said:
It gets a mention in this post-match report, but I must admit to not hearing properly / understanding what AN said!
Click to expand...
He said Naismith was a bit 'off colour' so didn't want to risk him (I think)

Well, he speaks the truth and the most telling thing for me last night, was that the fans were cheering the team as they left and I didn't hear a single boo (probably not in the same area of the ground as KIO!!!!)

royalbarclayfan said:
No I don´t think it´s acceptable, but nor is it in any way surprising, considering where we´ve come from, and the sort of financial clout we´re competing against. As I said, right from the beginning of the season, we´ve been scrapping for that 17 th place, and we really can´t expect an awful lot more in our first season back. Actually the last two have been vastly improved performances on the previous five or six, and we could easily have had at least two pts, and should justly have had one, if the linesman had done his job properly last night. Play like that against Swansea, Newcastle and Sunderland, which are the games we have to do it in, and we might easily take all nine pts, which would help our cause no end.
Click to expand...

And yield us 9 points, which would go a long way to ensuring our safety. Palace are looking vulnerable as well ......
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: Canary Rob
To answer my own question (From the Pinkun)

"Neil confirmed after the game he had left the Scottish international out as a precaution after adverse results in routine fitness tests by the club’s sports science department over recent days, hinting the Scot’s heavy workload had taken a toll after a bit-part role at previous club Everton."

Nothing like fighting spirit and useless officials to unite the canary masses.

Bah!
 
General bor, in his aftermatch interview the manager said Naismith had a slight niggle and was short of match practice as he had not been selected by Everton.
 
General Melchett said:
To answer my own question (From the Pinkun)

"Neil confirmed after the game he had left the Scottish international out as a precaution after adverse results in routine fitness tests by the club’s sports science department over recent days, hinting the Scot’s heavy workload had taken a toll after a bit-part role at previous club Everton."
Click to expand...

I will buy that. He does seem to put more physical and mental effort in to games than several others.
 
Canary Rob said:
Happy clapper I ain't. Not happy at all.

But changing the manager seems absolutely pointless to me.
Click to expand...

Sounds like our football recently! I don't want AN to go, but were we to lose to Swansea in similar fashion to our recent Villa debacle, with little fight and no quality then I would make my way on to the fence. I think as games go it has become need/must win and definitely must not lose! Losing to a rival that could be dragged back into the fight would be a disaster.

Bah!
 
General Melchett said:
To answer my own question (From the Pinkun)

"Neil confirmed after the game he had left the Scottish international out as a precaution after adverse results in routine fitness tests by the club’s sports science department over recent days, hinting the Scot’s heavy workload had taken a toll after a bit-part role at previous club Everton."

Nothing like fighting spirit and useless officials to unite the canary masses.

Bah!
Click to expand...

Seems like a good decision to me, Naismith looked a bit jaded and under par against Leicester, and it´s more important he´s involved and fit against Swansea, than burnt out after being involved last night.
 
My take on last night for what its worth
The crowd were certainly behind the team and very vocal last night.
Unfortunately the same old problems are there.Our right flank in
the 1st half was awfull,but improved dramatically in the 2nd
when Redmond decided to join the party.I think 3 centrebacks
and 2 wingbacks is our best set up,but I would have Bassong
for Martin in the middle of the 3.
Pinto and Brady are great going forward,but need cover from
Redmond and "AN OTHER"
We looked better when O'Neil came on,as Tettey was awfull.
Up top from now on has to be Bamford and Jerome.
Howson was superb last night and has certainly raised
his game.Wes also had a good game.Ruddy looks
more assured since his return.

Lady luck has certainly deserted us,certainly on tight calls
from Ref and Linesman ,but it aint over till the fat lady sings OTBC
 
  • Like
Reactions: chinacanary
yarco canary said:
My take on last night for what its worth
The crowd were certainly behind the team and very vocal last night.
Unfortunately the same old problems are there.Our right flank in
the 1st half was awfull,but improved dramatically in the 2nd
when Redmond decided to join the party.I think 3 centrebacks
and 2 wingbacks is our best set up,but I would have Bassong
for Martin in the middle of the 3.
Pinto and Brady are great going forward,but need cover from
Redmond and "AN OTHER"
We looked better when O'Neil came on,as Tettey was awfull.
Up top from now on has to be Bamford and Jerome.
Howson was superb last night and has certainly raised
his game.Wes also had a good game.Ruddy looks
more assured since his return.

Lady luck has certainly deserted us,certainly on tight calls
from Ref and Linesman ,but it aint over till the fat lady sings OTBC
Click to expand...

I agree with the 3 centrebacks formation being our best bet and all of Brady, Olsson, Pinto and Whittaker are probably more adept at playing wingback than an out n out fullback.
I can't agree with Bassongs return. We have looked more solid at the back with the 3 playing together, they have done so for two games and you want to change it again. Bass has played all season and not been a part of a solid rear guard, I see no point disrupting this three for Bass who probably doesn't significantly improve it anyway. It's time to stick with 3 and hope that they can keep improving with more games together. AFterall we've all been critical of the constant tinkering by AN.
And if you are to play Bamford and Jerome then who will you sacrifice? Hoolahan/Naismith? Redmond who is finding a smidge of form? I'm not sure how you can make that work?

Bah!
 
yarco canary said:
My take on last night for what its worth
The crowd were certainly behind the team and very vocal last night.
Unfortunately the same old problems are there.Our right flank in
the 1st half was awfull,but improved dramatically in the 2nd
when Redmond decided to join the party.I think 3 centrebacks
and 2 wingbacks is our best set up,but I would have Bassong
for Martin in the middle of the 3.
Pinto and Brady are great going forward,but need cover from
Redmond and "AN OTHER"
We looked better when O'Neil came on,as Tettey was awfull.
Up top from now on has to be Bamford and Jerome.
Howson was superb last night and has certainly raised
his game.Wes also had a good game.Ruddy looks
more assured since his return.

Lady luck has certainly deserted us,certainly on tight calls
from Ref and Linesman ,but it aint over till the fat lady sings OTBC
Click to expand...

Is there an invisible force shield on the half way line that tells Tettey to turn round and go back???
He was terrible last night, worse than normal, he just slows the game down so much, is frightened to go forward and can't pass!
I for one was glad when he went off!
 
ilovedelia said:
Is there an invisible force shield on the half way line that tells Tettey to turn round and go back???
He was terrible last night, worse than normal, he just slows the game down so much, is frightened to go forward and can't pass!
I for one was glad when he went off!
Click to expand...
Well, you for one may be glad to know that pending the result of an MRI scan, he fears he won't play again this season.
http://www.pinkun.com/norwich-city/...eason_is_over_after_chelsea_injury_1_4440247?
Which presumably would mean cobbling together a fragile defensive midfield by juggling Howson, Dorrans, O'Neil and / or Mulumbu.
Not what's required with some tough, critical games coming up :(
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Top Bottom
Back