See now we're talking about putting wide men and strikers into CM. They'll be plenty of games where an AM is not the right way to go. where a DM and two conventional CM are order of the day. We either have to patch it up by playing players well out of position or we can't play with the right shape for the opponent. It's not a good position to be in when we're 4 points cut off.
We're only going one way imo. Proper doomed. The squad lacks the quality and depth to stay in this league.
At least it will be more entertaining with the players we brought in. But we are doomed I'm convinced. Just don't have the squad to stay up.
I think we have the players to play a similar system to Spurs.
------------------Pickford----------------
Yedlin-------Kone-----JOS--------PVA
------------Kirchhoff---M'Vila-----------
AJ---------------Khazri-----------Borini
------------------Defoe--------------------
The two full backs have licence to get up and down the wing.
Kirchhoff plays the "Dier" role, slotting into a 3man defence when the full backs push on.
M'Vila is our "Dembele", helping out defensively and pushing forward when possible.
The rest is self explanatory. Everything I'd read suggested Khazri's best position was in a free creative role just behind the striker, similar to Eriksen for spurs.
AJ / Borini / Lens / Watmore are interchangeable. Catts on the bench to play either Kirchhoff's or M'Vila's role if needs be.
I really think this formation and tactic suits our players the best by far - both our full backs are better gong forward than defensively, and Kirchhoff is a CB-cum-DM, just like Dier.
Spurs have shown it works. It's a no-brainer to me.