Daily Racing Thread Monday 1st. Feb. 2016

  • Please bear with us on the new site integration and fixing any known bugs over the coming days. If you can not log in please try resetting your password and check your spam box. If you have tried these steps and are still struggling email [email protected] with your username/registered email address
  • Log in now to remove adverts - no adverts at all to registered members!
Anyone care to guess which one of Jim Best's 4 runners in the first at Plumpton will be trying hardest? <laugh>
 
OddDog said:
Anyone care to guess which one of Jim Best's 4 runners in the first at Plumpton will be trying hardest? <laugh>
Click to expand...

Very unfair, I have told you guys before they have cleaned up their act.

Cert forecast in this with Clayton/Generous Jack but not sure of the order. What I do know is that neither of these two yards like losing to the other!
 
stick said:
Very unfair, I have told you guys before they have cleaned up their act.

Cert forecast in this with Clayton/Generous Jack but not sure of the order. What I do know is that neither of these two yards like losing to the other!
Click to expand...

GJ for me
 
Very Live 2.10@Plumpton
Come on Richie!
You must log in or register to see media

Now that my money is on, sure to finish 2nd; I've had so many runners up in the last 3 days ... ( well, more than 2 anyway)
 
Plumpton
210 like sully
245 snowball
320 will she be trying
350 burgess dream
Kempton
215 little Indian

Good luck all who play
 
  • Like
Reactions: SimonJ
Also looking at Royale Knight, 2.45@Plumpton and Little Big Man, 2.15@Kempton

How about an Elliott double @Wolverhampton?
Lady Fandango, 3.10
National Service, 5.15

Good Luck all.
 
NassauBoard said:
Should a jockey be allowed to ride against his family? Clearly they knew what was going to happen and look what happened in the market before the off.
Click to expand...

If they knew before the off then I am sure they MUST have known all weekend!
So why the Generous Jack gamble? Either they didn't know or the bookies have yet again engineered a "false gamble" by shortening a horse without really having any serious money for it.
If I had more time I would research these gambles more closely but I am 100% certain that just because a horse is blue across the board on oddschecker it doesn't actually mean the yard think it will win. Bookies playing mind games!
 
SimonJ said:
Also looking at Royale Knight, 2.45@Plumpton and Little Big Man, 2.15@Kempton

How about an Elliott double @Wolverhampton?
Lady Fandango, 3.10
National Service, 5.15

Good Luck all.
Click to expand...

Get in Little Big Man, couldn't be closer, cracker, what a nice start today, 2 from 2.
I'd best stop now ( although that Elliott double looks a good one .... )
 
  • Like
Reactions: Harbottle
Probably way off the mark but ive had a little ew tickle at 20s on ASSAULT ON ROME in the 4.10 who i consider too big at the price.
 
Wolves
3.40 Zainat
4.10 abbey angel
5.15 national service

There in a lucky 15 with fairy foxglove in the first. Meant to put them up earlier.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Top Bottom
Back