Off Topic Dark Matter and other Astronomy information.

Just off recent posts I will mention the "hottest year on record" thing, Sisu claims that there was a considerably hotter year on record and sites the same source as the new claim, nobody has tried to debunk this or even answered it (it just doesn't exist).
People counter some of his arguments with the same source time and time again but give no alternative corroboration.

Do you believe the Polar Bear population is growing, declining or just staying the same?

 

you noticed that huh, happens a lot

 

Erm no I didn't , we have had this claim from you many times when you have been desperate. I merely used the topic as a tool to show you that you were notas free thinker as you thought. Hence your meltdown that time when you realised I was right.

 

Talking about your links, you one eyed bigot.

 

Haven't looked at it. So why do you think I am not open minded?

 

I know, many things just get ignored on here when an answer is hard to find

 

Talking about all links, that is why I say many of the "debunking" links are from the same source

 

Have you missed a few pages?

 

Fixed

 

Yep went out today to watch our match, have looked previously at polar bear stuff and for me the data was always pretty inconclusive

 

Truth of the matter is NASA adjusted their data but not their documentation. This usually happens when you dont do things in a managed scientific project.I know this from running projects documentation an essential part of the process.
They have data on their own bloody site that refutes their hottest year claim

AND in the released report for 2015, the link to the GAT stuff didn't work, it would have been the same section as the 1997 GAT report I posted that contradicted the 2015 claims.

In short, because it is not science, it is not run like science, it's nothing but manipulation of data to further a political and economic agenda, the green loonies have been had and they dont even know it but they dont care because the $$$ is flowing like never before.

 

Oh right, so do you mean why do I only debunk stuff from sisu?

 

By "few pages" I was talking weeks

Have you not noticed how Sisu often posts links/graphs from the sources you believe to prove them wrong? Their own data proves them wrong (contradicts them) yet nobody ever answers that?

 

Another question I asked that obviously was ignored was, if you worked for 15 years to eventually get a job at NASA, and the director was doing something you thought was dishonest what would you do?

No one answered this. It is valid question, as it relates to how career can be used to keep you in line.

Do you speak out and become an outcast in your field.. lose your prestigious job.. and find it impossible to ever get funding, and if you eventually manage to get non government funding, green loonies will use that to ruin your character regardless of your science.

This is a question facing ever young scientist getting into this field

 

Nope, I mean why do you ignore certain stuff. Is it hard to refute when it comes from the alarmist sites?

 

The sources I believe ????? See what I mean about an open mind.

 

Another ignored question, if you have no data for the southern hemisphere for 100 of the last 120 years, how do you produce a 120 year temperature series?

 

Alarmist sites??? Open minded I think not.

 

Sorry, you are right to pull me on this. I have no idea where you get your belief that man is causing climate change from.
For all I know you may have come to this conclusion on your own many years ago.

 

I use that term as a joke, kind of like "denier"