I'm saying nothing til he plays. I remember being confident about Colback, look how that turned out.
The point is this, the Jack army are far from bitter over this, and we are well over the moon at £12 Million for strengthening our front line, and many thanks for that, (not you, your club) but Shelvey never really fitted into our passing game, was always giving away possession, but we were very patient, matter of fact too patient, and this season it all unfolded, so once he was dropped our games picked up, and once we get rid of Go-miss, we will be back on track.
Shelvey needs to understand he is not as good as he thinks he is, and I watched your game against Manu the other night, and I couldn't for the life of me see why you wanted him, but there you go hope he starts to listen, because Shearer's words to him are very appropriate...........![]()
Was that you quoting a post from nearly 4 years ago Bri?? Surely even you can recognise that a player's value will be different when he has 5 years of a contract left rather than 1, and also that a player's value would be higher when he had just completed a season in a midfield partnership that had been touted as one of the most effective in the premier league (by neutrals) and had won plaudits for being part of a team that finished 5th?
Genuine question: Do you think it's the case that Shelvey is the problem, or was he just the focus for the fans' anger? The reason I ask is that it's often the case that teams have players who frustrate the fans and who the fans blame for poor results. The facts don't always back up the opinions though. I believe, in our case, Paul Dummett is a bit like that in that we get frustrated with how he plays and yet in practice have a (slightly) better win percentage when he does play.
In the case of Shelvey, you earned 1.1 points per game when he played and 0.75 points per game when he didn't. Just wondered why you think you're a better team when he is left out when your results are worse. Are there other factors that we wont know about, not following your club week in week out?
Bit harsh on Shelvey comparing him to Dummett! He is literally the ****test LB I have ever seen. As a cb though he is not to bad!
I'm saying nothing til he plays. I remember being confident about Colback, look how that turned out.
Bit harsh on Shelvey comparing him to Dummett! He is literally the ****test LB I have ever seen. As a cb though he is not to bad!
Genuine question: Do you think it's the case that Shelvey is the problem, or was he just the focus for the fans' anger? The reason I ask is that it's often the case that teams have players who frustrate the fans and who the fans blame for poor results. The facts don't always back up the opinions though. I believe, in our case, Paul Dummett is a bit like that in that we get frustrated with how he plays and yet in practice have a (slightly) better win percentage when he does play.
In the case of Shelvey, you earned 1.1 points per game when he played and 0.75 points per game when he didn't. Just wondered why you think you're a better team when he is left out when your results are worse. Are there other factors that we wont know about, not following your club week in week out?
You must never have seen Mark Stimson. Or Haidara tbf who is massively inferior to Dummett.Bit harsh on Shelvey comparing him to Dummett! He is literally the ****test LB I have ever seen. As a cb though he is not to bad!
Bit harsh on Shelvey comparing him to Dummett! He is literally the ****test LB I have ever seen. As a cb though he is not to bad!
Genuine question: Do you think it's the case that Shelvey is the problem, or was he just the focus for the fans' anger? The reason I ask is that it's often the case that teams have players who frustrate the fans and who the fans blame for poor results. The facts don't always back up the opinions though. I believe, in our case, Paul Dummett is a bit like that in that we get frustrated with how he plays and yet in practice have a (slightly) better win percentage when he does play.
In the case of Shelvey, you earned 1.1 points per game when he played and 0.75 points per game when he didn't. Just wondered why you think you're a better team when he is left out when your results are worse. Are there other factors that we wont know about, not following your club week in week out?
Don't know if you've heard but we sold Carroll to recoup £20m (including loan fee) so it's only £11.4m to go now![]()
Very true but but he's still never been close to being worth 20m in his lifejust this season the lad has slapped a 20m valuation on Sissoko
I'm amused by the 20ms more than anything. Everything is 20m in alberts worth.
****ing hel Nev, Banter is hard with youDidn't come for in depth foot chatter just a bit of light hearted ribbing on the running 20m theme.

Just popped £10 on Shelvey to score anytime.
I have a feeling the lad will play today and play well.
We need grit and determination and an ENGLISH heartbeat.
Colback will come good and fit well alongside him. Despite what the bitter Mackems say they would love him in their side right now.
We are ****ed without tiote it's going to be Shelvey and colback and neither can tackle
Don't write players off before they kick a ball for us Chaos. That's being too ****ing negative. Oh wait.
Id like shelvey and tiote is all im saying not Shelvey and the utterly useless colback
7/2 coral