Transfer Rumours Shelvey- Done deal!!!!!!

  • Please bear with us on the new site integration and fixing any known bugs over the coming days. If you can not log in please try resetting your password and check your spam box. If you have tried these steps and are still struggling email [email protected] with your username/registered email address
  • Log in now to remove adverts - no adverts at all to registered members!
I'm saying nothing til he plays. I remember being confident about Colback, look how that turned out.
 
The point is this, the Jack army are far from bitter over this, and we are well over the moon at £12 Million for strengthening our front line, and many thanks for that, (not you, your club) but Shelvey never really fitted into our passing game, was always giving away possession, but we were very patient, matter of fact too patient, and this season it all unfolded, so once he was dropped our games picked up, and once we get rid of Go-miss, we will be back on track.

Shelvey needs to understand he is not as good as he thinks he is, and I watched your game against Manu the other night, and I couldn't for the life of me see why you wanted him, but there you go hope he starts to listen, because Shearer's words to him are very appropriate...........<ok>

Genuine question: Do you think it's the case that Shelvey is the problem, or was he just the focus for the fans' anger? The reason I ask is that it's often the case that teams have players who frustrate the fans and who the fans blame for poor results. The facts don't always back up the opinions though. I believe, in our case, Paul Dummett is a bit like that in that we get frustrated with how he plays and yet in practice have a (slightly) better win percentage when he does play.

In the case of Shelvey, you earned 1.1 points per game when he played and 0.75 points per game when he didn't. Just wondered why you think you're a better team when he is left out when your results are worse. Are there other factors that we wont know about, not following your club week in week out?
 
<laugh><laugh><laugh><laugh><laugh>

Was that you quoting a post from nearly 4 years ago Bri?? Surely even you can recognise that a player's value will be different when he has 5 years of a contract left rather than 1, and also that a player's value would be higher when he had just completed a season in a midfield partnership that had been touted as one of the most effective in the premier league (by neutrals) and had won plaudits for being part of a team that finished 5th?

Poor Bri. Too much time on his hands to trawl back 4 years for a soundbite. I'm all warm inside now. #nojpfnotthat
Still a top lad though.
 
Genuine question: Do you think it's the case that Shelvey is the problem, or was he just the focus for the fans' anger? The reason I ask is that it's often the case that teams have players who frustrate the fans and who the fans blame for poor results. The facts don't always back up the opinions though. I believe, in our case, Paul Dummett is a bit like that in that we get frustrated with how he plays and yet in practice have a (slightly) better win percentage when he does play.

In the case of Shelvey, you earned 1.1 points per game when he played and 0.75 points per game when he didn't. Just wondered why you think you're a better team when he is left out when your results are worse. Are there other factors that we wont know about, not following your club week in week out?

Bit harsh on Shelvey comparing him to Dummett! He is literally the ****test LB I have ever seen. As a cb though he is not to bad!
 
  • Like
Reactions: Captainchaos.
Bit harsh on Shelvey comparing him to Dummett! He is literally the ****test LB I have ever seen. As a cb though he is not to bad!

At least he's a defender! I remember watching us go a full season playing a midfielder, Kenny Wharton, at left back - and even allowing for the differences in fitness levels in the game - Dummett is a world class left-back compared to him!! The point stands though that Dummett comes in for dog's abuse and yet our record is better when he is in the team (regardless of whether he is the reason for that or not). I think all groups of fans develop pre-conceptions of players and you could have two players put in exactly the same performance and one would be given a 3/10 because we noticed everything he did badly and the other would be given a 7/10 because we noticed everything they did well - even though both performances were 5/10. I sometimes think Dummett falls victim to this. I just wondered if Shelvey had fallen victim to this at Swansea.

Totally agree that Dummett is a far better CB than LB though.
 
I'm saying nothing til he plays. I remember being confident about Colback, look how that turned out.

Ha ha I knew he wasn't good enough how on earth anyone thought otherwise I find absolutely astonishing.

It's got to be Shelvey and tiote oohhh wait tiote is sold so we have **** pairing colback and shelvey will not work
 
Bit harsh on Shelvey comparing him to Dummett! He is literally the ****test LB I have ever seen. As a cb though he is not to bad!
Genuine question: Do you think it's the case that Shelvey is the problem, or was he just the focus for the fans' anger? The reason I ask is that it's often the case that teams have players who frustrate the fans and who the fans blame for poor results. The facts don't always back up the opinions though. I believe, in our case, Paul Dummett is a bit like that in that we get frustrated with how he plays and yet in practice have a (slightly) better win percentage when he does play.

In the case of Shelvey, you earned 1.1 points per game when he played and 0.75 points per game when he didn't. Just wondered why you think you're a better team when he is left out when your results are worse. Are there other factors that we wont know about, not following your club week in week out?

Not the fans - for some reason Shelvey was idolised even when he could't be bothered and made impetuous tackles that led to goals. In fact he was teflonn as far as the vast majority were concerned. The flair up in Oxford was down to a very small group who had a more realistic view of player who could never cash the cheques his ego is writing. The kid is hurting and making a mountain out of a mole hill to cover up, he loves to be adored and for the most part he was.
The points gained is largely skewed by late losses to Man City away and Man U away (Sunderland was a freak game). No matter how poor he'd been Monk always played him ahead of better players (or players who worked for their place) and that became an irritant and, following his return from the Internationals in the autumn he increasing argued with colleagues during games. Being dropped at City (as were other regulars) should have inspired him to buck up but he seems to have pouted instead, as was evident in his quite shocking performance at Palace. His attitude led to Palace withdrawing their interest and hence Jonjo has gone to you instead of his beloved London.
In many ways I do feel sorry for him but he was given all the opportunity in the world at Swansea and adulation to boot.
 
I think Shelvey will probably end up getting on our fans' tits. I think he has enough talent to make it here but unfortunately, like many young footballers, won't have the desire to make it work. I will keep an open mind, though, and judge him on performances. The world is the oyster of any young footballer who comes to play for this club, if they realise that and work their arse off.
 
Genuine question: Do you think it's the case that Shelvey is the problem, or was he just the focus for the fans' anger? The reason I ask is that it's often the case that teams have players who frustrate the fans and who the fans blame for poor results. The facts don't always back up the opinions though. I believe, in our case, Paul Dummett is a bit like that in that we get frustrated with how he plays and yet in practice have a (slightly) better win percentage when he does play.

In the case of Shelvey, you earned 1.1 points per game when he played and 0.75 points per game when he didn't. Just wondered why you think you're a better team when he is left out when your results are worse. Are there other factors that we wont know about, not following your club week in week out?

Just makes me think of the saying about there are three kinds of lies namely lies, damned lies and statistics.

In order to look at Dummett's effect on the team (or anyone else's) you cannot just look at, for example, points per game with Dummett and points per game without Dummett. So many other variables come in to play such as opposition, who replaced Dummett, whether anyone was sent off etc.

Agree Dummett is a decent defender but as a centre half as he is absolute garbage as a left back. That isn't based on statistics that's based on watching him and shouting at him.
 
Very true but but he's still never been close to being worth 20m in his life<laugh> just this season the lad has slapped a 20m valuation on Sissoko <laugh> I'm amused by the 20ms more than anything. Everything is 20m in alberts worth.

****ing hel Nev, Banter is hard with you<laugh> Didn't come for in depth foot chatter just a bit of light hearted ribbing on the running 20m theme.

Good to see Funky back beelin'.<laugh>
Go easy on him less hope!
 
Just popped £10 on Shelvey to score anytime.
I have a feeling the lad will play today and play well.
We need grit and determination and an ENGLISH heartbeat.
Colback will come good and fit well alongside him. Despite what the bitter Mackems say they would love him in their side right now.
 
O
Just popped £10 on Shelvey to score anytime.
I have a feeling the lad will play today and play well.
We need grit and determination and an ENGLISH heartbeat.
Colback will come good and fit well alongside him. Despite what the bitter Mackems say they would love him in their side right now.


Odds?