Off Topic Dark Matter and other Astronomy information.

  • Please bear with us on the new site integration and fixing any known bugs over the coming days. If you can not log in please try resetting your password and check your spam box. If you have tried these steps and are still struggling email [email protected] with your username/registered email address
  • Log in now to remove adverts - no adverts at all to registered members!
Status
Not open for further replies.
This is where Astro and tobes like it, personal slagging match, cos well, science is beyond them.
Especially Tobes

Astro is adept at copying text and editing it slightly to make it seem like it came from him. <doh>
 
This is where Astro and tobes like it, personal slagging match, cos well, science is beyond them.
Especially Tobes

Astro is adept at copying text and editing it slightly to make it seem like it came from him. <doh>

[HASHTAG]#beforemodernindustry[/HASHTAG]
 
Sisu posts paper refuting Astro
Astro claims deniers and the cost of a paper and regurgitates previous post that Sisu paper refutes.

<doh>

Now it's exactly where you guys like it, a place where you cannot be embarrassed. Dragging it down to your level, I can do that, for charity like.
 
So you still stand by the paper being evidence of no AGW even though it only applies to thousands of years [HASHTAG]#beforemodernindustry[/HASHTAG] ?
 
Now if you two halfwits don't mind I've a few things to do (or am running away from your awesomeness) as you call it.

Later chaps, nothing personal. No meltdowns now, sooner you pair get back to bickering the better.
[HASHTAG]#warmdayinjuly[/HASHTAG]
[HASHTAG]#daffodilsindecember[/HASHTAG]
[HASHTAG]#proofofglobalwarming[/HASHTAG]
[HASHTAG]#nowaitmanmadeclimatechange[/HASHTAG]
 
The group think by you two is really sad, when faced with a superior opponent on a matter you band together and form consensus


@astroturfnaut
You post from alarmist site, and then claim I use denier site. Hypocrisy?

Abstract
The solar impact on the Earth's climate change is a long topic with intense debates. Based on the reconstructed data of solar sunspot number (SSN), the local temperature in Vostok (T), and the atmospheric CO2 concentration data of Dome Concordia, we investigate the periodicities of solar activity, the atmospheric CO2 and local temperature in the inland Antarctica as well as their correlations during the past 11,000 years before AD 1895. We find that the variations of SSN and T have some common periodicities, such as the 208 year (yr), 521 yr, and ~1000 yr cycles. The correlations between SSN and T are strong for some intermittent periodicities. However, the wavelet analysis demonstrates that the relative phase relations between them usually do not hold stable except for the millennium-cycle component. The millennial variation of SSN leads that of T by 30–40 years, and the anti-phase relation between them keeps stable nearly over the whole 11,000 years of the past. As a contrast, the correlations between CO2 and T are neither strong nor stable. These results indicate that solar activity might have potential influences on the long-term change of Vostok's local climate during the past 11,000 years before modern industry.

http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1364682614002685

That's the same Chinese state produced report that you posted earlier. That conveniently ended it's graph at the point where the correlation ends.
 
[HASHTAG]#bangtorights[/HASHTAG]

Try reading what you copy and paste next time <ok>

hahaha, he's that desperate to find a retort to cover the gaping hole that's been pointed out in his logic, that he's grasping at any old ****.

His thorough research of the subject and completely objective view on the entire spectrum of climate change (having apparently weighed up all of the information from both sides), has completely altered since 9.30 today.
 
hahaha, he's that desperate to find a retort to cover the gaping hole that's been pointed out in his logic, that he's grasping at any old ****.

His thorough research of the subject and completely objective view on the entire spectrum of climate change (having apparently weighed up all of the information from both sides), has completely altered since 9.30 today.

Logic.. I suggest you look that up too<ok>

1 offer is a market rate. [HASHTAG]#tobeslogic[/HASHTAG]
[HASHTAG]#housingprices[/HASHTAG]
 
You mean the lag that didn't exist in your theory at 9.30 this morning?

That 'lag'?

Maybe you should look up the word 'charlatan'

You are avoiding the point, as usual. Ignoring it wont make it go away. Clearly the oceans can store a lot of heat, soo. Look up "lag"

The posts? I keep asking for them and you keep not posting them
 
Like the 9 minute lag before you saying you're running away from [HASHTAG]#beforemodernindustry[/HASHTAG] and actually doing it?

Ah so it's all about these little claims now, rather than the topic, this is the area you and Tobes do well, but when nailed down to specific points, you disappear/

You searched for 20 minutes for a debunk to that paper and came back with excuses when you couldn't find one.

Another 3 minute expert, though you did try. partial credit
 
Meh, like arguing with the church in times past, they just won't believe the earth is not flat.

The saddest thing is two nitwits arguing a subject they had opinions on before they even know what the subject was. <doh>

At least you two fools learned something this past few months <ok>

Well not Tobes, he's too dim to even grasp this not so difficult stuff

It's like arguing with people who suffer with Alzheimers, they keep making the same arguments every 2 or 3 months forgetting they already got debunked. <doh>

[HASHTAG]#goingroundincircles[/HASHTAG]
AStro mullered again and spooling crap at 40 words per minute.

You are an embarrassment to educated people everywhere, you pathological clown., Take your denial delusion and hyperbolic paraphrasing elsewhere
That's not even an argument, it's what? <laugh>

You thick ****, go away, you are not even close to grasping this <laugh>

Defcon 2

[HASHTAG]#meltdown[/HASHTAG] imminent
 
Status
Not open for further replies.