Well against Liverpool and United we suddenly stopped attacking down the flank that we were getting joy from. Either Koeman told them to do that or he didn't notice. Either way poor. Also his subs against United lost us the game IMO. And why he picked Caulker against Liverpool over Yoshida was ludicrous.
This shows that it is not easy.
Do you really think Ron told the players to stop doing what was working (attacking wide)? Think about that calmly for a moment - the answer must be know unless Ron is some kind of fruit cake.
I believe we lost the game against united because the players stopped doing what was working. Old ground I know but Pelle for one literally spend 35 minutes of that second half walking.
I agree on Caulker, but I'm lead to believe he did ok when he came on as a sub against City three days before that game. Is that right? Reading in here and those that saw the game, they seem to say that. So let's take that a minute. Manager sends replacement CB on and he does well/ok but then doesn't play him in next game. I believe it was TinTin that said about Gazza that a player coming in and doing well should start the next game. Jose was injured, manager plays player who replaced him ok in previous game .... Is that really a bad decision? I don't think so (and I'm saying I prefer Yoshida) as it is a logical decision. Caulker was just awful.
In answer to your other post about relegation, I don't want us relegated but as you said, I don't think that will happen. We are in a bad run of results over the last 6 league games and we want that to turn around. I'd like us to stick with the manager as long as we don't really end up looking like being relegated as this club needs stability. We as fans moan because players leave and therefore we lose that stability - I can't see that changing when things go well. This leaves stability with the manager. If we have a poor season ( this may be it, but two wins suddenly changes that picture) then so be it. I can live with that. I forecast us to finish 12th but if it's 15th/16th, ok it happens. If we change the manager who is probably the highest profile manager we have had since Glen Hoddle, we then go through a whole knew set-up, risk of people settling in, players not liking or understanding the new manager or coaches and the gamble starts again.
It's not nice right now, however it's 6 games where we've got 1 point having won 20 points prior to that. This means it's not all bad.
The key thing for me is that despite all the expertise on here (that's not a dig as I include myself in that) we do not know what the answer is. We are just speculating and to be honest, hopefully all hoping that something will change it back for the better.