Charlatan!
Anyone who choses a username that doesn't accurately describe their real-life persona is sick in the head
Tell that to Tarquin Biscuit-Barrel
Staggering Hypocrisy in Moderating Posts
- Thread starter DevAdvocate
- Start date
-
Please bear with us on the new site integration and fixing any known bugs over the coming days. If you can not log in please try resetting your password and check your spam box. If you have tried these steps and are still struggling email [email protected] with your username/registered email address
-
Tell that to Tarquin Biscuit-Barrel
Indeed, but apparently i'm not allowed to post photos on the Gers board. That's how the Nazis got started.
I didn't realise the internet was about in the 1930's
I can't believe this is still going on
This
I think the issue has clearly highlighted the fact that acceptable moderation is beyond your competenciesBe nice
Why do you delete posts when no one asked you to?
Simple question from a simple person!
ML is not so much a moderator
He is more like a bouncer at The Grapes
To be fair, you can't just pick and choose what is offensive, but if you dont like something then avoid it
He is more like a bouncer at The Grapes
To be fair, you can't just pick and choose what is offensive, but if you dont like something then avoid it
Be nice
Also, didn't you get caught recently changing another person's posts?
J
Jobby Funbags
Guest
Charlatan!
Anyone who choses a username that doesn't accurately describe their real-life persona is sick in the head
I am an actual sheikh.
I also shake people's stonners on request <paymebitches>
"Dev because my nickname was "Dev" and I know a wee bit about the law, hence "Advocate"."
That's cringing how poor that excuse is.
Sadly you seem to be unable to differentiate between "excuses" and "facts". I was a Copper you know, we do get some training on the law.
Again
Because he wanted to be one of the gang.
ML is not a bad lad I suspect, just a bit misguided in this particular instance.
1. It was the intimidators posts
2. yesterday I deleted girvans 'catholic bumming' thread
3. I was asked to be mod, and as far as I'm aware it is ultimately my responsibility what stays and what goes
I prefer leaving the board to run itself, and only step in and do anything if I think it needs moderated. In this instance I have said to dev to point out anything he finds offensive and I will remove the content. Nobody has ever sent a genuine complaint about content on the rangers board. If they did, then I would review it as soon as possible.
Also, what is with the obsession over the Rangers board? If you don't like the stuff on it then stick to your own teams board instead of going to your rivals simply looking for an argument.......it really is that simple
2. yesterday I deleted girvans 'catholic bumming' thread
3. I was asked to be mod, and as far as I'm aware it is ultimately my responsibility what stays and what goes
I prefer leaving the board to run itself, and only step in and do anything if I think it needs moderated. In this instance I have said to dev to point out anything he finds offensive and I will remove the content. Nobody has ever sent a genuine complaint about content on the rangers board. If they did, then I would review it as soon as possible.
Also, what is with the obsession over the Rangers board? If you don't like the stuff on it then stick to your own teams board instead of going to your rivals simply looking for an argument.......it really is that simple
Fuck me is this the car park thread?
A lot of greeting faced bheggars chucking toys about the place.
Dry yer eyes ya shower of gimps.
A lot of greeting faced bheggars chucking toys about the place.
Dry yer eyes ya shower of gimps.
Also, what is with the obsession over the Rangers board? If you don't like the stuff on it then stick to your own teams board instead of going to your rivals simply looking for an argument.......it really is that simple
Perhaps if you modded the Rangers pages and didn't allow room for racism and sectarianism then people wouldn't feel it necessary to go on there and highlight it. It isn't our job to police your pages, it is yours. I am not an avid reader of your pages but as far as I can tell there isn't a single dissenting voice amongst the not 606 Huns. You are the mod, presumably asked to do it as you are a reasonable sort but your lack of balls to take on those with a less level headed stance makes you an internet eunuch.
It is evident you are not capable of fulfilling your role, unless you man the **** up.
Like Dev said, you are not a bad lad but you are certainly spineless.
I like arguing Venom, it's as simple as that.
dev·il's advocate (dvlz)
n.
1. One who argues against a cause or position, not as a committed opponent but simply for the sake of argument or to determine the validity of the cause or position.
Apology accepted.
1. It was the intimidators posts
2. yesterday I deleted girvans 'catholic bumming' thread
3. I was asked to be mod, and as far as I'm aware it is ultimately my responsibility what stays and what goes
I prefer leaving the board to run itself, and only step in and do anything if I think it needs moderated. In this instance I have said to dev to point out anything he finds offensive and I will remove the content. Nobody has ever sent a genuine complaint about content on the rangers board. If they did, then I would review it as soon as possible.
Also, what is with the obsession over the Rangers board? If you don't like the stuff on it then stick to your own teams board instead of going to your rivals simply looking for an argument.......it really is that simple
My posts were removed and they were not in any way offensive unlike the stuff that is there unmoderated. You made that decision on your own and said my posts were "Off topic". I never complain about content to moderators, even when my name is splashed all over the place, I never complained about the stuff that was on that or any other thread.
It seems very much like "it's ma baw" on the Gers board, if you want to turn it into a no go zone for fair comment then do so, just don't expect not to be criticised for it.
We have nothing to hide on the Celtic board, like our club it is open to all, it seems the Rangers board is mired in the sixties.