true that lad. I did read there GMP were called by very old people who were lonely and had trouble looking after each other, cops stopped and had a brew and a chat, and you had ****s on twitter giving the cops **** for it. That's the kind of policing I like.
Not you The Turkish and Bosnian fans. I was about to make it clearer as I realised you might think I meant you, due to the Israel comment. Just put this mix up down to Israel.
I really shouldnt have to repeat this either. But he's only ever taken offence to ppl claiming that Islam is responsible for their actions. So what should he do Donga, just say nothing? Not try and tackle misconceptions bcos if he does object, he'll be classed as thinking he's a victim? Maybe it's not him being sensitive here, well no less sensitive than you or those who see the temerity in him trying to defend his faith.
I couldn't post on here last night until this afternoon. No prizes for guessing who I blame. Yep, Israel. Most of all I blame them for that god awful brass band.
The problem with this tame friendly is that there doesn't seem one Frenchman taking it seriously enough to put Sterling on a stretcher.
But treble, it is responsible. The difference between Isis and normal people who follow Islam is the interpretation of the words they read. That's not suggesting all Muslims are terrorists or that Isis represents all Muslims. Religions biggest flaw is how loosely it is written and how contradictionary it is. Its purposely left open to interpretation.
Religion's biggest flaw is it gives people the feeling they're justified in acting like ****s. A bit like football in a sense, but far worse and more ****y.
Well yeh, how that person interprets the text. Your comparison with football fans is interesting. A minority once spent its time using violence etc, all English clubs were banned. The world certainly considered all English the same.
Man, I agree with a lot of what you say, but that's irrelevant here. Live and let live! The guy has made his position re ISIS very clear. In my view, believe what you want to believe. Just don't try and ram it down my throat, and equally I won't attack your beliefs.
Absolutely. If a group of Millwall fans went around stabbing people every week, it wouldn't really be enough for the club to say "they don't represent us, nothing to do with us". Religion of peace so I'm told.
You wrote this a while back... Seemed to me to imply that he was defending the perpertrators. To which I replied... Meaning that he doesnt connect with the perpertrators at all. You then stated that's not what you meant at all. To which I replied... And having drawn a line under the misunderstanding I tried to move back to the original point about him thinking he was a victim. You know even if you say he isnt the victim, I could understand. But the reference to the 100+ dead, or any comparison to them, comes across as though his intention is to take something away from them. Which I thought was unfair.
Still completely nonplussed as to how any of that cnoversation could lead to a misunderstanding about how Spurlock was accused of defending terrorists.
Please do! They are murdering scum, we all agree on that. The civilised world should be uniting on this one issue.
