Off Topic Paris (again)

  • Please bear with us on the new site integration and fixing any known bugs over the coming days. If you can not log in please try resetting your password and check your spam box. If you have tried these steps and are still struggling email [email protected] with your username/registered email address
  • Log in now to remove adverts - no adverts at all to registered members!
Status
Not open for further replies.
I can't for the sole reason being that is an unknown number that cannot be proved. It certainly isn't as high as you will undoubtedly claim.

If you actually ****ing did some research once in a while you'd know that ISIS stand for everything Islam doesn't. Muslim scholars from all over the World have condemned ISIS and their actions, one of the reasons being that they are using Islam for their own ends despite the fact they are going against that faith itself.

Go educate yourself when you awaken from your drunken stupor, you prat. Goodnight.
Very few people think that the West should attack all Islamic communities.
I think a majority of people in the West thinks that we should attack terrorists in every way possible. One of those ways would be to attack ISIS in Syria. The UK are refraining from doing that. The attacks that are being carried out are very limited.
 
It really doesn't. No more than chocolate milk does, or your daft ramblings. There is no ****ing excuse.

don't be a moron
ofcourse it does

you would be a ****** to think otherwise

just look at paris tonight.
 
I've always been of the view that the west needs to be the policeman of the world. They should try to educate countries when they step over any certain lines which need to be discussed and decided. Responses should range from talking to the leaders of countries, through to sanctions and finally invasion. I would think that prolonged sanctions would be sufficient if all other countries complied with the sanctions requests. If they didn't comply they should suffer similar sanctions.
The alternative would be to tell these countries we don't like what they are doing and them ignoring us.

Bloody hell, Peter; rarely have I read a more condescending and totally arrogant post than that - and you're an intelligent man. Scary.
 
I can't for the sole reason being that is an unknown number that cannot be proved. It certainly isn't as high as you think.

If you actually ****ing did some research once in a while you'd know that ISIS stand for everything Islam doesn't. Muslim scholars from all over the World have condemned ISIS and their actions, one of the reasons being that they are using Islam for their own ends despite the fact they are going against that faith itself.

Go educate yourself when you awaken from your drunken stupor, you prat. Goodnight.


You highlight one of the problems there. Muslim scholars. There is no system of hierachy like in a lot of other religions. Priests, vicars and others can get booted out (though not all those who deserve to be always are) and everyone knows and they are out of a job and not making any money. Anyone can declare themselves a Muslim scholar and start spouting their own interpretation of Islam. A lot of them live on benefits they are quite happy to take off the hated infidels, indeed some prominent ones have said it is their duty to do so. Theynalso seem able to fly off around the world whenever they want with no worries about cost. These preachers are spouting all sort of nonsense out of earshot of everybody, not in a pulpit like nutters such as Paisley did. And what happens when they are filmed spewing out hate and calling for death for infidels, Jews, homosexuals and Sharia law in Britain? The police threaten the film makers with prosecution and want the programme notbto be broadcast.
 
  • Like
Reactions: BrAdY
Bloody hell, Peter; rarely have I read a more condescending and totally arrogant post than that - and you're an intelligent man. Scary.
So what do you think the West should do about stoning women for adultery or amputation for other crimes?
 
Can anyone say, why it appears there are more successful attacks in France?

Does the UK and suchlike have better intelligence or have they just been lucky so far?

France just seems to get hit more, but maybe thats just my perspective.

I just think France has made itself a focus by some of it's culture challenging doctrine; if they want to focus on us, and do the necessary preparation, they could rip our days apart.
 
I just think France has made itself a focus by some of it's culture challenging doctrine; if they want to focus on us, and do the necessary preparation, they could rip our days apart.

remember when the afghan troops abused afghan boys?
 
I was flying from Moscow to Novosibirsk about 5 years ago and got gassed by the Russians at sherometova ? Airport - some of the people around me were flat out frothing at the mouth - they really take no prisoners - apparently the whole airport was gassed to stop one person -

They knew what we know now, Charon; you're the Ferryman.
 
France are going to close their borders. For some reason they are doing it after they have let a lot of people in rather than before.

So explain to us all your solution, Peter?

I heard that they'd closed them to stop people getting in but it would be logical for both reasons.

Ah, a gem of reasoning.

So what do you think the West should do about stoning women for adultery or amputation for other crimes?

Live our lives, follow our beliefs, maintain our laws and work to convince others of where we believe they are wrong. I think we do that, but there is no instant gratification on a global basis. You might disagree.

Maybe Fez will say that we are condescending or arrogant if we intervened.

Explain that, Peter, and I will respond.
 
You seem to think we shouldn't intervene in other countries other than use persuasion. These countries don't care about our views so if we limit ourselves to talking they will continue to kill homosexuals, stone women, amputate people, abuse children, etc.
 
Is there any serious attempt to keep illegals out? France is part of Schengen.
Regarding the UK: There are Border Security in Calais and they can stop illegal migrants but they only look for illegal migrants in a small sample of vehicles. If an illegal immigrant gets to the UK and is detected they usually ask them to report weekly but most just disappear. I don't think they are serious enough.

Should we keep legals out, also?
 
Status
Not open for further replies.