I have negative proof but I don't think it counts under the rules as it's not what you want to hear. In this situation I believe you have to pretend you haven't seen it as it conflicts. Rule 6.3. Verse 16, Book of Relic.
You're telling me fella. My Mag tickets have arrived and I'm itching for the game with only a west brom stream on Saturday and the Scum stream on Sunday to get my fix in.
I'm gutted to be missing the Mags match... I'll be on a train down south early on the morning I'm hoping for a couple of matches late Nov / early Dec before I get the 'dreaded' call telling me to go back to work. Some very interesting games this weekend like... Let's hope we hit the ground running eh
**** man. Weren't you away for both fixtures last season? Aye, a first win isn't too much to ask for at game 9 is it?
I was away for the away game and was travelling away on the day of the home game in April... Lucky Omen maybe What with that & your missus going; we should have all bases covered marra
Yep, we're doing our part. The only other time the derby has been won 6 times in a row is never. It's a chance to brand the ****s and humiliate them for many a year to come.
Terry v Relic. **** it. Let them get on with it. I like the both. Two completly different styles of posting. Both equally as good. I have a lot in common with terry. He has my type of humour. Which is slightly disturbing. But i also like relic posts. I like being educated on the past.
Hello all. I've been checking back a bit here. My argument with the Manc ****head started on the thread entitled 'Jobs for the Boys' http://www.not606.com/threads/jobs-for-the-boys.313103/. It started by me saying the Development team is doing well, as are the Ladies team. There's nothing wrong with the running of this club except the first team. (Post 2, Page 1). But (Home & Away, Billy, Disco, anyone else remotely interested) please have a look at the following. The Manc ****head replied that anyone who thought SAFC wasn't riddled with mis-management "from top to bottom" was talking "****" (Please try to find his contemptuous post - # 18 - and see for yourself what it says - you won't because it's since been deleted. There is nothing between #17 and #19!). I replied that this was "drivel" - the under-21s are top of their division, the under'18s are third in their division, and the Ladies team were pushing for the top spot. The problem is just the first team. The reply I got (#38) was amazing - 10 to 15 lines of absolute age-ist filth. Along the lines of "I don't care how many sacks of coal you've carried over your shoulder or how many 20lb balls you kicked about in the snow without shoes on, you'll get no respect from me - repeat none - you f*cking bone-rattling dithering coffin dodger". That sort of thing. Please, I don't want you to take my word for it. I'm asking - look post #38 up for yourself. You won't because, believe it or not, that has been deleted as well ! There's nothing between # 37 and #39. Ha! how strange. Home & Away - I'm sorry, but I have to ask, did mods remove these disgusting posts - or is some smart-arsed liitle Manc poser trying to cover his tracks here? Who removed #18 and #38, H&A? Seriously, I'm putting it to you - I'm being frigging framed here. Who's behind those convenient deletions, H&A? Who? And if you can't tell me, may I please request Minxie's involvement? The fat-mouthed Manc once threatened to "fry" me - well, let*s take it to the wire and see if he can. I know what's in those two deleted posts, and I'm damned sure Minxie can trace them back. I doubt very much if 'good ol' Terry' is gonna like this..
Relic. Sorry mate. You have to let it go. Keep calling him the manc ****head is not helping at all. Believe me. I have had many a run in with other members. None more so than with smug. I dont know id you were around then but others will tell you what we were like. It really was no good for the board. So we buried the hatched. So for good of the board. May i suggest that you do the same. And stop getting so workef up. For the record. Terry is not a manc ****head. He may be a manc ****. But he.s our manc ****. We like him. He is a great poster. Just like yourself. Let it go.
I meant every word of what I said to that crusty ****ing rodent. He's an absolute **** stain on this board, nothing more, nothing less. Some of you might not see the underhand way he goes about devaluing others on this board but I and several others do. I've been PM'd by some of the most respected members on this board saying he deserved everything he got, like I said to Marcus yesterday, if you want to ban me then go ahead but nobody will get me to make up with him.
For the record, I never deleted anything! Why would I? I'm more than happy that I took this ****ing decrepit sack of **** to the cleaners, he can go **** himself with his withered little useless todger. Look how angry he got, talking about super mods, I've already given the normal mods the nod to ban me if they want, I'd fully understand, because I know how this board works. Unlike Relic who thinks this board is a stomping ground for him to spit his bile at anybody younger than him. I've admitted that I come at him with the sole intention of making him fizz up like a sore arse bitch and he's obliged very nicely, he's twisted himself up like a sack of dusty old pretzels, so ****, I don't care he's nothing to me but a spineless ****ing clown.
For the record, the senile old **** thinks the posts have been deleted but it's just because he's blocked me ****ing hell. Ranting that he can't see my posts after he's deleted me.
That maybe correct. I have one person on ignore. So sometimes wonder wtf people are talking about when they are answering him.
