Apparently they are only considering Ancelloti and Klopp. What if neither of them want the job? They could both get better positions.

What is happening on this board? Yesterday i was called a heretic and today i'm being shouted "sacrilege" at! You've all gone loony
The £300 million is not fair. He had some top players sold that he had to replace. I don't like it when Gooners go on about us spending fortunes when we have balanced the books over recent seasons and so I can't let it pass when it's a team I don't like. Net spend is the critical gague, not gross. I suspect they have still spent a fortune, but it's not £300m, surely. Replacing Suarez and Sterling,, and, and - ok my argument is unravelling.I’d take my chances with Gerrard over Klopp, that’s for sure.
I thought a group that could get the Red Sox their first title in eighty years could do anything with anyone. Tain’t necessarily so. First they failed with the old guard, then with new blood The second mistake is stranger than the first. Rodgers wasn’t all bad in terms of results. He did have one good year, Suarez or no. But how he spent 300 million, and how anyone let him spend 300 million, remains a mystery. How FMG will make a profit is a bigger one.
The £300 million is not fair. He had some top players sold that he had to replace. I don't like it when Gooners go on about us spending fortunes when we have balanced the books over recent seasons and so I can't let it pass when it's a team I don't like. Net spend is the critical gague, not gross. I suspect they have still spent a fortune, but it's not £300m, surely. Replacing Suarez and Sterling,, and, and - ok my argument is unravelling.
That is very true. It has bit him back, big time.Fair point but only if the big-gobbed idiot hadn't said how we should be challenging having spent a third of what he did.
Your forgot Downing...but I think their net spend is about £150m over the last four years.The £300 million is not fair. He had some top players sold that he had to replace. I don't like it when Gooners go on about us spending fortunes when we have balanced the books over recent seasons and so I can't let it pass when it's a team I don't like. Net spend is the critical gague, not gross. I suspect they have still spent a fortune, but it's not £300m, surely. Replacing Suarez and Sterling,, and, and - ok my argument is unravelling.
Really is a sad time them sacking Miss Brenda, now means they'll likely improve under their next gaffer (whether it be Klopp/ Ancelotti), especially if they're given another £300m+ to spend. Suarez and Sturridge kept him in the job longer than he should've been, no sympathy for him anyway, especially after his gobby comments about us - which ultimately backfired and made him look a right tit.


