Transfer Rumours Charlie Austin Stuff

  • Please bear with us on the new site integration and fixing any known bugs over the coming days. If you can not log in please try resetting your password and check your spam box. If you have tried these steps and are still struggling email [email protected] with your username/registered email address
  • Log in now to remove adverts - no adverts at all to registered members!
Lets just hope that it all happens quickly wherever he goes, this is worse than pulling teeth.....
 
Well it looks like Chas will not be signing for West Ham...

Charlie Austin is not worth £15m, he didn’t even keep QPR up - West Ham chief David Sullivan

You must log in or register to see images


West Ham co-chairman David Sullivan believes that the east London club cannot afford to take a £15m 'gamble' on Charlie Austin this summer.

The striker has been strongly linked with a move away from Loftus Road in the wake of Queens Park Rangers' relegation from the Premier League but Chris Ramsey's side have stood firm on their valuation of the 26-year-old.

The Hammers are one of several sides that are interested in the English forward, but Sullivan is adamant that Slaven Bilic's side cannot afford to risk a large chunk of their budget on a player that still has question marks over his fitness.

"Firstly, we haven't got £15m to spend under the Fair Play rules. Secondly, he [Austin] failed a medical at Hull a couple of years ago. They say he has no ligaments in his knee, who knows? To sign a £15m is a big risk.

http://www.standard.co.uk/sport/foo...-west-ham-chief-david-sullivan-a2917861.html?

And this is funny, Chas tweeted
something that may have been aimed at Sullivan in response to his put down...


Charlie Austin posts cryptic tweet, fans believe it's aimed at David Sullivan

QPR forward Charlie Austin has taken to Twitter yet again with a cryptic tweet.

And supporters have perceived it as a jibe at West Ham United co-owner David Sullivan. Indeed, Sullivan has recently spoken about the QPR forward and West Ham fans understood Austin's tweet to be aimed at him.

You must log in or register to see images
Charlie Austin

✔@chazaustin9

The cheeky ..............

11:37 AM - 20 Aug 2015
http://www.hitc.com/en-gb/2015/08/2...cryptic-tweet-west-ham-fans-believe-its-aim/?


 
I hope he doesn´t go to WHU, I used to like them as most of the guys I used to play football with were fans but they lost their ´attractive´ football tag like us many years ago and their owners are pretty unsavoury characters as well. Stay with us Charlie you know it makes sense!!
 
I feel I have no option but to address the inaccurate, misleading and uninformed innuendo about my physical condition that has been raised today by an individual who is not privy to my personal health history. It is one of a number of inaccurate reports about my so-called injury problems which have been made over the summer.

For the record, there is nothing wrong with my “ligaments”, as has been suggested. My strength and performance in pre-season has been excellent and with two goals in my last two games I don't think there is any doubt that my match sharpness is as good as ever. I scored 18 goals in the Premier League last season, which would not be possible were I feeling discomfort or pain.

Like many professional footballers, I have the legacy of injuries picked up over my career but the effect on my day-to-day training and on matchday is non-existent. For a senior figure at a Premier League club to insinuate that I could break down at any moment is an outrageous slur on my professionalism and the work that has gone into making me the footballer than I am today. I am fit, strong and looking forward to Saturday’s home game against Rotherham.
 
I feel I have no option but to address the inaccurate, misleading and uninformed innuendo about my physical condition that has been raised today by an individual who is not privy to my personal health history. It is one of a number of inaccurate reports about my so-called injury problems which have been made over the summer.

For the record, there is nothing wrong with my “ligaments”, as has been suggested. My strength and performance in pre-season has been excellent and with two goals in my last two games I don't think there is any doubt that my match sharpness is as good as ever. I scored 18 goals in the Premier League last season, which would not be possible were I feeling discomfort or pain.

Like many professional footballers, I have the legacy of injuries picked up over my career but the effect on my day-to-day training and on matchday is non-existent. For a senior figure at a Premier League club to insinuate that I could break down at any moment is an outrageous slur on my professionalism and the work that has gone into making me the footballer than I am today. I am fit, strong and looking forward to Saturday’s home game against Rotherham.
Shame it's not against the Spammers Kin sleazebags the pair of them!
 
West Ham co-chairman David Sullivan believes that the east London club cannot afford to take a £15m 'gamble' on Charlie Austin this summer.

The striker has been strongly linked with a move away from Loftus Road in the wake of Queens Park Rangers' relegation from the Premier League but Chris Ramsey's side have stood firm on their valuation of the 26-year-old.

The Hammers are one of several sides that are interested in the English forward, but Sullivan is adamant that Slaven Bilic's side cannot afford to risk a large chunk of their budget on a player that still has question marks over his fitness.

"Firstly, we haven't got £15m to spend under the Fair Play rules. Secondly, he [Austin] failed a medical at Hull a couple of years ago. They say he has no ligaments in his knee, who knows? To sign a £15m is a big risk."


But they paid a shed load more for the worlds' biggest crock, Caroll ......................... funny that.
 
Gold wants Austin, Sullivan doesn't.

So Sullivan tries to scupper any possibility of a move by slurring Austin.

Who would want to work for a nasty, slimy pornographer like Sullivan anyway?

Steer clear, Charlie. If you go, go anywhere but there.