You mean Jose last season? Fair enough but that still doesnt answer the question. How come he disagrees with your honest assessment about having your ar5es handed to you on a plate today?
It was a nice story for last season. Factually incorrect but a nice story nonetheless. Maybe Jose can convince PSG to pay £50million for Zouma
He needs the academy to raise funds as Chelsea are destitute. Did you not see Terry and Ivanovic huffing and puffing their way through the first half? It was like watching a pair of old men having a kickabout with their kids!
Hmmm... Chelsea have not seen one of their own become a regular first-team player since captain John Terry, despite opening their £30m academy in 2005 with running costs of up to £8m a year. That's another Begovic they could buy to replace Courtois “If you don't bring kids through the academy, the best thing is to close the academy,” said Chelsea manager Mourinho. “and use the money to buy players." Maybe he knew a year ago the funds were drying up and was planning ahead to raise the money this way? Expect this in the news any day now.
This CFC, how do you explain Maureen's claim that Chelsea were the 'better team' in the 2nd half given that you conceded twice as many goals as you did in the first half ?
That is your red top Sky sensationalist spin on it. Even the Fail says... The Chelsea boss admitted that he had no arguments with the result when his players make such poor defensive errors. 'Their second and third goal, I can also say is my players mistake and if you're punished by your players mistakes, then you deserved to be punished by that. 'I think they were the best team for 45 minutes and we were the best team for 45 minutes. But they didn't make big mistakes defensively and we made two big mistakes in the last part of the game.'
True or false ? Did Mourinho say that Chelsea were the better team in the 2nd half and that it was a 'false result' ?
Errrrrrrrm... "We had not one single problem in the second half" Did we all just imagine those 2 goals? Maybe we (and I include you in that) did imagine it bcos.... "We were the better team in the 2nd half" And it was a "fake result" Has he gone senile, seriously or is it just pressure as he may be one more loss away from being sacked?
I think we all know that that 'bite' bollocks is just another way of trying to squirm out of being shown up as being an idiot.
True that. I'd still like CFC to explain how Maureen's claim that they were the better team in the 2nd half can be true when they conceded twice as many as they did in the first half. He's gone awfully quiet on the matter.
I want him to explain "We had not one single problem in the second half" But I dont mind if he answers yours first Questions questions questions
What the **** are you going on about ? I'm asking you to explain how Maureen's claim can be the case ? Unless you're saying that you don't agree with it and he's talking utter bollocks ?
