classless club, they should just accept that we was the better team on the day and that they was lucky to have had a point after underestimating us. it would be a disgrace if the red card gets rescinded
If Courtois isn't clattering in to him then his touch is better, clear red, he prevented a clear goalscoring opportunity.tight decision, but definitely a pen, not so sure about it being a nailed on red though, it was a very heavy touch past Courtois from Gomis. I'm sure most of you would feel a bit agrieved if it was the other way around. That said, I don't think it should be over-turned, it's a matter of opinion as to whether it was a goal scoring opportunity or not and it's not outside the realms of reality that he might've scored it, would have been GotM if he had.

He does it to protect his players, after all, despite it being 100% a stupid and rash decision by Courtois, it's Mourinho taking the flakLike I said buddy, he's simply and sneakily deflecting attention away from his own inadequacies. He's managed his club badly all summer, highlighted by their poor performances.
No signings at all, no wins in 5 pre-season games, players not being trained effectively and now his latest arrogant blunder was to show a decent team little respect. It cost him and could have cost him more of course.
Not once did he mention our name in post match interviews, all he did do was blindly grope for his stock excuses, 'it was all the refs fault'. Poor pompous Jose has been sussed, special in victory but completely blind in defeat.
We cuffed him in the moolies on Saturdayand it hurt like hell
He does it to protect his players, after all, despite it being 100% a stupid and rash decision by Courtois, it's Mourinho taking the flak
It read: “If a player sustains or appears to sustain an injury and indicates that he needs assistance, it is the duty of the referee to permit medical assessment and evaluation to be provided.
"At that moment the player becomes a patient of the medical team and it is the duty and obligation of Club medical staff to attend to that patient accordingly and without prejudice to the interests of anyone else including the Club employing them.
The Football Medical Association fully supports the actions of our members and colleagues in this incident who acted with integrity and professionalism at all times, fully cognisant of the rules of the game and in full accordance with that duty of care to their patient.
"Factors extraneous to the immediate medical needs of the patient (such as the stage and state of the game) cannot be part of their consideration at such time"
It read: "The health and safety of our members is of paramount importance and the need, when required, for prompt assessment and treatment is critical in ensuring this.
The player and the referee are the initial judges as to whether treatment is required and, the matter is then the responsibility of the highly qualified and trained medical staff.
This protocol has worked successfully in past seasons and we can see no justifiable reason to move away from this.
Tell me how can a doctor assess a patient from circa 50 meters away? She made a decision based on what she had in front of her, by the looks of things an injured player, okay with the benefit of hindsight it was the wrong decision, the problem is that she has no such benefit.
You tell me what is more important the player or the game?