So it was the police's fault for inciting a riot? All the trouble throughout Northern Ireland and it's the police's fault?
![]()
No, the Orange order and its bigoted cheerleaders.
So it was the police's fault for inciting a riot? All the trouble throughout Northern Ireland and it's the police's fault?
![]()
No, the Orange order and its bigoted cheerleaders.
So it is justified to burn out cars, throw petrol bombs, rocks etc. because you don't agree with a march going past a nationalist estate, not through it?
Did I say that?
I haven't forgotten about you Pwesty.
You can retract your erroneous statement any time you like.
What exactly are you saying the Webel? You seem to comment on other peoples posts and ideas but have yet to reveal your own. So tell me Webel what are your thoughts on this?
Simple. You don't get riots if you don't have bigots provoking them.
If you insist on joining "an archaic biggoted(sic) institute", march around a field, don't provoke trouble.
Two years, tops Medro, and then it's bye bye bigots.

Did I say that?
Well that is my question. You seem to think it is horrifying to use water cannons. Can you answer my question.
what M.P?
Simple. You don't get riots if you don't have bigots provoking them.
If you insist on joining "an archaic biggoted(sic) institute", march around a field, don't provoke trouble.
Walking down a road silently is provoking someone?

ok then, no. I didn't say that.
the police in britain themselves say it is not a proportionate method.
It is a weapon. it is dangerous.


Is it justified to burn out cars, throw petrol bombs, rocks etc. because you don't agree with a march going past a nationalist estate, not through it?
It is entirely understandable that a certain element will react in such a way.
Is it justified to provoke such a reaction in the first instance?