Can you crack the code

[Benvenuto Cellini]

.

 

[Girvan Loyal 1690]

It did withstand the impact though.

 

[Benvenuto Cellini]

.

 

[Girvan Loyal 1690]

Architects are fannies. Everyone knows that.

 

[VenomPD]

Desperate stuff. Tinfoil Monday.

 

[Benvenuto Cellini]

.

 

[DevAdvocate]

Would have been harder to hit wtc7 with a plane because of its positioning and height, impossible maybe, although, seems nothing was impossible that day.

And the people who say why didnt they just blow up the buildings, why go to the trouble. The main point was obviously the psychological effect, it had to be a seen attack on tv. And as bad as they are, they would have been trying to limit casualties as much as possible. Just blowing the buildings up would have resulted in infintely higher loss of life, and the resulting question of how the **** where the towers rigged.

Indeed.

 

[Benvenuto Cellini]

.

 

[DevAdvocate]

Dev wouldnt dare get into anymore discussions, hes been schooled too many times.

Fleeting smilies and ad hominem is what he has been reduced to.

I've told you loads of times Eddie, you don't believe this **** any more than I do, If you did you would not be worth arguing with, lunatics seldom are.

As you said "Why go to all the trouble" of blowing up the buildings when you can achieve the same objective using remote - controlled drones, super thermite, holograms and hundreds of CIA/Mossad operatives.

 

[Benvenuto Cellini]

.

 

[DevAdvocate]

I didnt say that, and I explained why.

Maximum effect, minimize casualties.

Aye because they were obviously desperate to minimise casualties, that is crystal clear. No doubt health and safety were involved.

 

[Benvenuto Cellini]

.

 

[DevAdvocate]

They have a warped sense of morality, they are not bloodthirsty serial killers.

The justify loss of life for their plans, it doesnt mean they wont take actions to minimize it, its standard practice.

Else they would have used real bombs and killed real people in Boston.

People had to die in 9/11, was no way around that.

They? Who is that exactly?

 

[Benvenuto Cellini]

.

 

[Girvan Loyal 1690]

The illuminati

 

[Benvenuto Cellini]

.

 

[DevAdvocate]

I dont know exactly who they are.

You would bet you life on a conspiracy but not on who the Conspirators were?

 

[Benvenuto Cellini]

.

 

[DevAdvocate]

Technically aye, in the sense that by betting against the conspiracy of 19 arabs with stanleys, I would indirectly be betting that there was a conspiracy to promote bullshit.

So you think it is impossible that the men named were actually highjackers. They played no part at all.

I'm amazed the Saudi government did not protest their citizens' innocence, unless they were part of this conspiracy?

 

[VenomPD]

I suppose it all comes down to plausibility and in that case it's entirely plausible that there are many people using GC who are actual ******s.