Can you crack the code

  • Please bear with us on the new site integration and fixing any known bugs over the coming days. If you can not log in please try resetting your password and check your spam box. If you have tried these steps and are still struggling email [email protected] with your username/registered email address
  • Log in now to remove adverts - no adverts at all to registered members!
How do we know you'll admit it if someone gets it right?

You need to PM the answer to someone and they don't get to guess but will act impartially when the correct answer is posted.
 
If you can crack the code, I will withdraw all 9/11 assertions, accept the official doctrine and admit I was wrong all this time


imor wpmhj nab isih kdlx



the clues: Toby close, ahwid


you have 48 hours
That's why they call him boris fenster
 
  • Like
Reactions: Benvenuto Cellini
If you can crack the code, I will withdraw all 9/11 assertions, accept the official doctrine and admit I was wrong all this time


imor wpmhj nab isih kdlx



the clues: Toby close, ahwid


you have 48 hours

To crack the code you must theorise it's construction within any context gained via additional intel.

Context has been given (the clues).

Clearly the code is sequence/word based (spaces are included in the code)

So then is it a simple alphabetic translation where letters are supplanted by a simple offset? For example a = a +3; we can try this by iteration of different offsets to see if it fits the contextual clues.

On the other hand, are the "clues" a cryptographic key that instead of being context are indeed seed to the rule used....

...av got fed up writing this ****e. <laugh>

In other words, meh.