I said I wouldn't renew until I knew the outcome of the name change - due to the FA poncing about I've had the option to buy taken out of my hands, it's no real problem. If the name remains the same I've decided to do away games only. Last season, listening to fans booing each other, North Stand fans abusing West stand fans, I've finally come to the conclusion I've had enough of the KC and it's toxic atmosphere.
Should the name change, that'll be me finished (and **** you TigerRoo, the prick who thinks I'll change if Hull Tigers score goals, the objectionable **** him) - I'd like to be able to shrug my shoulders and say ''it's only a name'', but I can't - the coming season should be my 50th anniversary of watching City, should the worse come to the worse, I'll be gutted to miss it, but, I've done my bit for the Humber Bridge debt and I'll be happy getting my football fix closer to home at Brigg or Winterton.



Oh dear. Looks like the hissy fitters are out in force yet again.
There are a host of reasons that are adding to fans disharmony. If anything, there seems to be a lack of desire to actually unite fans behind the actual problems.
Other 'fans' generating problems, seemingly to keep the ill feeling and disputes going is one significant one that creates disharmony amongst fans, as well as suspicion. A lack of places where 'open' discussion can take place does similar. On here, anyone pointing out an alternative view just seems to be subject to childish name calling, and the threads get disrupted.
There should be clear open discussion, and fans should feel that their opinion and input is valued and considered by the club and supporters groups alike.
As an example of how unity could have been helped rather than hindered, I've mentioned a few times, the name change is currently rejected, but our proper name isn't used. I would have expected a good discussion on here on ways to deal with that. That's just one example that could have helped people feel involved.
Fair post. But the genesis of all this is the Allams and the name change and contempt for fans, surely? If that hadn't have happened we wouldn't have needed unity in this way....?
Okay, we've been dealt the hand and maybe it could all be done in a better way. But the cards should never have been cut in the first place.
Whatever people do now, the blame lies squarly at the feet of the Allams.
The name change is certainly the fault of the Allams. The outcome and splits between fans can be blamed on that, but you can't ignore the fact that there seems little attempt to generate unity between fans and provide a voice at a time when I'd expect it to be beneficial.
What can be seen are numerous actions and missinformation that can only cause more disharmony, sometimes it turns out the anger was misplaced. There's also been limited opportunity taken for true open discussion and for fans to contribute.
Fair post. But the genesis of all this is the Allams and the name change and contempt for fans, surely? If that hadn't have happened we wouldn't have needed unity in this way....?
Okay, we've been dealt the hand and maybe it could all be done in a better way. But the cards should never have been cut in the first place.
Whatever people do now, the blame lies squarly at the feet of the Allams.
In fairness it's arguably a joke to make it seem like fans lack of unity is Allams fault. How long have you been on this forum? Even during the Allam honeymoon before the name change proposal and even before Allams there was very little unity. There's only unity between the majority on here. You get slagged off for having a different opinion no matter how petty the subject matter is.
Perhaps not on a scale of boos during the match but there were plenty of arguments over starting XIs, over sacking of PB and NB, over player treatment, over transfers, over stadium policies, over people leaving matches early, over those not singing and the list goes on...
Of course the name change proposal and therefore the Allams are directly to blame for the very specific arguments over the name change but as a whole it is not that different to other seasons. This argument feels more personal so it affects people a little deeper but fan unity in general is pretty much a myth. This forum is a prime example.
95% of the players - staff and fans have no trust in the Allams anymore. The point being that we now know that The Allams are fudging it and telling us porkies


Football forums, in my opinion, are like fans talking, arguing over a few pints in the pub - since the first football team was picked and watched by ''the man in the street'' (the fans), he's been able to pick a FAR better team than the professional manager, ditto with manager sackings - some agree and some don't, that's the nature of football, however, after all those arguments and disagreements in the pub and on football forums, come Saturday afternoon everyone's behind the team.
What we have now runs far deeper than any childish name calling over team and manager selections; neither Boothferry Park, or the KC stadium had ever had such fan against fan hostility than it has now.
What a load of crap ^^^^^^ this. 95% indeed ffs.
Whilst Steve Bruce is in complete charge of all matters football that is the most important issue.![]()
The more you post the bigger ****ing idiot you prove yourself to be.

In fairness it's arguably a joke to make it seem like fans lack of unity is Allams fault. How long have you been on this forum? Even during the Allam honeymoon before the name change proposal and even before Allams there was very little unity. There's only unity between the majority on here. You get slagged off for having a different opinion no matter how petty the subject matter is.
Perhaps not on a scale of boos during the match but there were plenty of arguments over starting XIs, over sacking of PB and NB, over player treatment, over transfers, over stadium policies, over people leaving matches early, over those not singing and the list goes on...
Of course the name change proposal and therefore the Allams are directly to blame for the very specific arguments over the name change but as a whole it is not that different to other seasons. This argument feels more personal so it affects people a little deeper but fan unity in general is pretty much a myth. This forum is a prime example.

If,as I think is the case, most disagree with the name change, which is the root of the problem it can't solely be the Allams setting fan against fan.
Some on here behave in a very similar way to the failings they lay at the door of the Allams, with misleading comments and allegations and abuse of City fans as well as a seeming contempt for their views.
I think most are in agreement on the root cause, it's actions beyond that that add to the disharmony.
Good stuff
Just so you know where I’m coming from (and to bore Chazz)…
As I’ve said elsewhere on here, watching Hull City has been a hobby for me. A really enjoyable hobby which I’ve loved over the years. I have other interests too. Interests that have seen me join in forums to chat and debate.
When there were rumblings of the Allams wanting to change the name, I looked online at Hull City forums to see if people felt that it was wrong, like I did.
The forums I looked at were AN and CI.
When the name change proposal went ahead I joined AN and let my feelings be known. But it was on CI that someone posted something like “CI is poo, not606 is best!”
I’d seen posts about not606 all over, but that one made me take a look at this forum. I thought it was good so I joined and started posting.
So I joined here because of what was happening with the Allams and name change etc. I think proper arguments about manager sackings, starting XI’s, player treatment etc are all fair game for heated debates. If I’d joined in with that stuff, I’d have had heated debates with people, no doubt. However, I’d still have respected the person I’m arguing with. Had a pint with him/her before the match. Agreed to disagree.
But the name change situation is so different. It’s not a football argument. It’s an argument of history and identity. To be walked all over or not be walked over.
It goes further than football.
It’s about a bloke who thinks he knows it all who wants to change our name. He calls us hooligans. He stealthily removes our name from the matchday programme, the website, the badge. He lies, he belittles us, he doesn’t understand that owning a football club is very different to owning any other business.
He fails to understand that he doesn’t pay us to go see his club play football. We pay HIM for that. But our voice doesn’t matter. We don’t matter.
Yes, this issue is different. So very different.
Allams Out!
