Transfer Rumours Transfer Rumours thread

  • Please bear with us on the new site integration and fixing any known bugs over the coming days. If you can not log in please try resetting your password and check your spam box. If you have tried these steps and are still struggling email [email protected] with your username/registered email address
  • Log in now to remove adverts - no adverts at all to registered members!
Gerrez said:
Pedro would be a great signing but he's not what we need right now IMO, we need a proper striker that isn't Balotelli, Lamert, Borini or Benteke!
Click to expand...

Who would you buy thats available then, or that would come to us?

I have to admit, I think the best we'll get in this current situation is Benteke. I also think it's nailed on we'll get him as soon as the little ****bag ****s off.
 
InBiscanWeTrust said:
Do we though?

Interchanging front 3/4 of Frimy, Pedro, Cout & Ibe/Markovic/Lallana should give us more movement & chance of goals.. Pedro has a decent goal scoring record. That should cope until Sturridge is back to give a proper CF option.

Heck with those lost providing chances, even Balotelli might get 5 goals <yikes>
Click to expand...

Yes! I never said we needed a target man, we don't. We need a striker; aka someone that can put the ball in the net on a regular basis!

Oh, and **** Balotelli, I'd rather play Shame Long!!!
 
Skylarker* said:
Who would you buy thats available then, or that would come to us?

I have to admit, I think the best we'll get in this current situation is Benteke. I also think it's nailed on we'll get him as soon as the little ****bag ****s off.
Click to expand...

I'd rather go for Pedro for £30m (although think he'd be cheaper) than Benteke for £30m.

Frimy, Cout & Pedro is a better front 3 on same wavelength than Firmy, Cout & Benteke.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Super G Ted'inho
Skylarker* said:
Who would you buy thats available then, or that would come to us?

I have to admit, I think the best we'll get in this current situation is Benteke. I also think it's nailed on we'll get him as soon as the little ****bag ****s off.
Click to expand...

Well, that part is subjective. I'd say Aubameyang but no doubt others will say its unrealistic. I wanted Tevez but that boat as sailed (not that it was ever going to happen)

Pedro wouldn't be the worst signing but I think it would leave us short on goals again if we get him in instead of a striker (not target man)
 
Gerrez said:
Yes! I never said we needed a target man, we don't. We need a striker; aka someone that can put the ball in the net on a regular basis!

Oh, and **** Balotelli, I'd rather play Shame Long!!!
Click to expand...


6 in 15 last year
15 in 28 year before when a regular
7 in 23 year before

Half decent goal scoring record for a wide player
 
  • Like
Reactions: Super G Ted'inho
InBiscanWeTrust said:
I'd rather go for Pedro for £30m (although think he'd be cheaper) than Benteke for £30m.

Frimy, Cout & Pedro is a better front 3 on same wavelength than Firmy, Cout & Benteke.
Click to expand...

Can't argue with that but Benteke should be the level setter!
 
Surprised at everyone rating Pedro. He never kicked on from what he promised. Did enough to stick around at Barca (yeah I'm aware that its quite impressive) but he has never been first choice. Maybe one season where he was supposed to break out of his shell but he never did.

Barcelona are not nearly as much of a threat when Pedro plays. Still a decent player but he's got a hint of Aaron Lennon about him - "oh he's young and he will come good next year" until you realise he's 28 and never did.
 
Forward Raheem Sterling, 20, has told Liverpool he will not go on their pre-season tour of Australia and the Far East, which starts at the weekend. (Daily Mirror
Liverpool have been told they will have to pay £32.5m if they are to sign Aston Villa striker Christian Benteke, 24. (Daily Star)
Liverpool could move for Lyon striker Alexandre Lacazette, 24, this summer. (L'Equipe via Talksport)
The fee Burnley will receive for striker Danny Ings is set to be decided by tribunal after the Clarets failed to reach an agreement with Liverpool for the 22-year-old England Under-21 international. (Lancashire Telegraph
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Top Bottom
Back