Me being right wasn't my objective, I was just a bit miffed that Marcus started drawing comparisons to a child sex offence case when discussing Roy Keane and his trivial taxi farce. Bri says 'innit' a lot too by the way
I'm not sure that the AJ case should have been made public as it was but I'm pretty sure comparing swearing at a cabbie to grooming a minor for sexual acts doesn't make that point very well.
See my following post for the more technical definition of the charge. Seems that I'm not allowed to be tongue in cheek on here anymore, in future I'll use the correct term. I don't think you're a ***** mate, I'm sure plenty of unsuspecting lads fall into the same trap all the time. We know little about AJ's trial, but if he's found guilty on every charge there is no two ways about it, he is a *****phile and will be placed on the sex offenders register.
*****philes are individuals with a preferred sexual interest in children and they are the primary distributors, producers of child pornography and child abuse imagery.- Metropolitan Police. Having sex with somebody who's underage does not make somebody a **** fella, not by a long shot. Nowhere near. Nor does fancying a fully developed teenage. 13 is usually the cut off point depending in the development of the victim and supported evidence is required to prove that children are the subject of their sexuality People need to wake up and realise that 13/14/15 year olds are not Children biologically. They are young women who need minimum effort to look like Adults. They can reproduce and have sexual urges and probably have done since they were 10/11, by the time they've hit 14/15 their sexual maturity is about half a decade ahead of lads their age. There's not one single man on this planet who's slept around who can guarantee 100% they haven't slept with a minor unless they're asking for ID from every shag who looked in their 20s.
That's all subjective again mate, I have no interest in anybody around that age so I don't have an opinion on where the line is drawn etc. I understand how the human reproductive system works and at what age it develops for purpose and that would probably have some bearing on primitive behaviour. I'll reiterate though, *****philes are people who are sexually attracted to children, in this country a person is deemed a child up until the age of 16. FWIW I think a 50 year old shagging a 16 year old is far, far worse than a 17 year old shagging a 15 year old but in this country that 50 year old is doing something completely legal as the 17 year old is, technically, by definition, considered fit for prosecution as a *****phile.
That's my point. You seem to have decided AJs sexual preference for him. And no he wouldn't. To be considered Peado you need to prove a prolonged general attraction to children. The difference between 17 and 15 would never ever ever make the 17 year old to be considered a Peado. If you can find a case which proves otherwise I'll bow down but the courts would never consider it ****philia. a two year age gap attraction could never be considered an unhealthy attraction. It's perfectly normal.
I haven't determined his sexual preference for him, I stated what he's been charged with mate. Obviously the first comment of him being charged with being a ***** wasn't the technical term. Culpability obviously plays a big part in conviction but the rest is subjective, depending on circumstantial evidence there's no way to throw a blanket over every case and dismiss it all as illegal or all of it as perfectly normal.
Don't 17 year olds have a right to anonymity? That'll make it impossible if so. Anyway, I'm with you guys on the theory of the 'lure' I was just trying to stick to the letter of the law. There's obviously scope for every case to be dismissed. I tried the jerky by the way mate, one of the worst things I've ever eaten, 6 hours of excitement and it ended in disappointment, my culinary skills really let me down every single time!
Unlucky! What was wrong with it? Three places you can **** up with it and that's seasoning, timing and temp.
All three I tried spicy, salted and honey BBQ marinades. All three tasted like sweaty mould! They looked great as well though that was the most disappointing part!
Ok, it sounds like the fat has been sweating. What cut did you use? It could well be that. I used Salmon Silverside because it's all one lean piece of muscle with very little integrating fat that's situated away from away from bone and gristle and it just loves to be sliced thinly. fat doesn't dehydrate well and could contribute to the foul flavour. I used a salt, pepper and Chinese 5 spice dry rub cure. It tasted great.
Salmon cut is off the silverside part of a cow. It's triangle shaped. please log in to view this image You want meat that if you were to roast it too long it would go dry and crumbly. So silverside or topside roasting joints are the way to go.
You do understand I'm very reluctant to try this again, you're not getting how badly I failed at this are you?
