we dont play 4-3-3

  • Please bear with us on the new site integration and fixing any known bugs over the coming days. If you can not log in please try resetting your password and check your spam box. If you have tried these steps and are still struggling email [email protected] with your username/registered email address
  • Log in now to remove adverts - no adverts at all to registered members!
E

elvisPIRESly

Member
Feb 19, 2011
43
0
6
i post very rarely, i prefer reading posts, but one thing that does my brain in is ppl claiming we should change from our 4-4-3 formaition. arsenal play 4-2-3-1 we have done for quite a while now. also, please no one else suggest a 4-4-2 with this as our midfield fab-wilshire-song-arshavin.......urgh!!! (fabs not a winger)

apart from that, hows every 1 feeling about next season? i feel we will do the usual top 4, im happy with the gervinho signing, we need a good winger! (second striker) and ryu (hadukeeeeeen!) sounds like such a good prospect.

and sorry to moan again, but please dont diss people on spelling mistakes. being able to spell well is NOT a sign of intelligence.

COYG
 
I agree with the welsh ****
We definatly need to change to 4-4-2 from 4-3-3 because the 4-3-3 we play now isn't as good as 4-2-2
a midfield of
fab-wilshire-song-arshavin
that would be really good and would work better than the 4-3-3 we play now
 
I'm in favour of 9-6-4 but to conform, yeah I'd like to see 4-4-2. In fact, I'd like to see any formation at home where we start with 2 out and out strikers. Ideally rvp off Walcott in a central role as I reckon he'd wreck teams from there where he can't get easily marked out of the game as he frequently is on the wing.
 
id love to see us reveart to 4-4-2 also, that wasnt my point with this thread, but i cant believe some gooners think fab should be on the wing. hes not a winger, hes a central playmaker, he would be wasted on the wings. if we were to go back to 4-4-2 my line up would be........and just my opinion btw...........

shez
sagna djouro kos verm
nasri wilshire gervihno
fab

RVP walcott
 
elvisPIRESly said:
id love to see us reveart to 4-4-2 also, that wasnt my point with this thread, but i cant believe some gooners think fab should be on the wing. hes not a winger, hes a central playmaker, he would be wasted on the wings. if we were to go back to 4-4-2 my line up would be........and just my opinion btw...........

shez
sagna djouro kos verm
nasri wilshire gervihno
fab

RVP walcott
Click to expand...
I hope we buy a new LB rather than play Verm there <ok>
 
Being able to count is though..
Think we should keep the 4-4-3. Would not get away with would we. Someone is bound to notice.

????
 
just realised the mistake, 4-4-3, really sorry, i meant 4-3-3, i think u knew that tho, why not just talk about the post, discuss arsenal rather than being anal about things like that.
 
What's wrong with 4-3-3? I'd have thought it would be perfect for Arsenal.

Usual back 4 and GK.
Fabregas Song Wilshere
Gervinho v.Persie Nasri

?
 
sorta close, but i started this thread cos although many ppl think we do, we dont play 4-3-3.

gonna be like this next season i think

song wilshire
gervinho/walcott fab/ramsey nasri/arshavin

van persie

although id love to go back to 442
 
People need to get a grip the 442 is an antiquated system.

1.Last team to win the league with a 4-4-2?
Us in 2003-2004 (which was more of a 4-4-1-1 anyway)the last team to win it with a traditional 4-4-2 was United in 1998-99.

2. Last team to win the European Cup with a 4-4-2?
Real Madrid in 2001-2002.

3. Last team to win a World Cup with a 4-4-2.
Brazil in 1994.

Just saying.

Also the op is right, last Season we did'nt play a 433 (except against United and against Newcastle) for most of the year we played a 4231.

1. A 4-2-2 is not more attacking than a 4-3-3. It's a myth, mainly because the English press generally cant tell the difference between a 451 and a 433.

2. A 4-3-3 does not have traditional 'wingers' but should contain three forwards - they are not part of the midfield. (much like Barcelona who play Messi/Villa out wide)
It's a much more attacking system than say a 4-5-1, something the English football press get consistantly confused about.

3. Nearly all of the better domestic and international sides have now adopted either a 4-3-3 or various four-banded formations (4-1-2-3 etc.) that allow a certain extent of fluidity within it&#8217;s constraints, thus facilitating a much more open and expressive style of football.

Yup.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Top Bottom
Back